US Federal House Bill HR672

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/3/25

Caption

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4553) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 104) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 105) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 106) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to ''Central Yukon Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan''; and for other purposes.

Impact

While House Resolution 672 itself does not directly alter state laws, the underlying House Bill 4553 proposes budget allocations that can have significant implications for state managing agencies, particularly in energy and water sectors. The appropriations outlined in the bill may alter funding levels for projects managed by state agencies, which can lead to shifts in state policy regarding resource management, environmental protection, and infrastructure development. As states receive this federal funding, they must adapt their regulations and practices to align with the objectives outlined in the appropriations bill.

Summary

House Resolution 672 is a procedural resolution regarding the consideration of House Bill 4553, which aims to make appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026. This resolution sets the rules for how the House will debate, amend, and ultimately vote on the bill. Included in this resolution are various joint resolutions aimed at disapproving specific rules submitted by the Bureau of Land Management that pertain to resource management plans in different areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HR672 and its associated bill appears to be cautiously supportive among most members of the House, particularly from those aligned with or representing interests in energy development and resource management. Proponents argue that increased funding and approved resource management plans will lead to improved infrastructure, promote economic growth, and ensure that energy resources are managed effectively. However, there are concerns from environmental advocacy groups and certain legislators who worry about the implications of disapproving current regulations, fearing that this could lead to weaker environmental protections.

Contention

A notable point of contention arises from the joint resolutions aimed at congressional disapproval of certain Bureau of Land Management rules. Critics argue that overturning these rules could undermine existing environmental safeguards meant to manage resources sustainably. Supporters counter that the current regulations are overly restrictive and inhibit necessary development in energy and water management sectors. This debate underscores a broader tension between resource development priorities and environmental conservation, as stakeholders on both sides have strong investments in the outcomes of the appropriations bill.