US Federal House Bill HJR105

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/10/25
• Refer: 7/10/25
• Engrossed: 9/4/25
• Enrolled: 12/1/25
• Passed: 12/11/25
• Chaptered: 12/11/25

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".

Impact

The passage of HJR105 would have significant implications for federal management of public lands in North Dakota. It would repeal specific management strategies and regulations put forth by the Bureau of Land Management, signaling a shift in how federal policies are shaped and enforced. This could alter business operations and land use practices across the state, creating a more permissive environment for resource extraction and potentially impacting local ecosystems and communities dependent on sustainable land management practices.

Summary

HJR105 is a congressional joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management regarding the 'North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan.' This resolution emphasizes Congress's authority to review and disapprove rules under the Congressional Review Act, asserting legislative oversight over certain administrative actions. If passed, the resolution would effectively nullify the cited resource management plan and the decision made by the Bureau of Land Management, underlining the contentious relationship between federal regulatory agencies and legislative bodies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR105 appears divided, showing a clear divide between proponents and opponents of the resolution. Supporters argue that the resolution reflects the need for greater congressional accountability in federal land management decisions, advocating for a legislative check on federal agency rules that they perceive as overreaching. Conversely, opponents worry that disapproving the resource management plan could lead to unregulated activities that might compromise environmental protections, highlighting concerns about the long-term impacts of such legislative actions on public lands.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HJR105 revolve around its implications for local governance and environmental stewardship. Critics of the resolution argue that it undermines the expertise of the Bureau of Land Management and disregards community input in land use planning. The resolution raises essential discussions about the balance between economic interests and environmental safeguards, illustrating the complexities inherent in federal land management policies and the push-pull of legislative versus administrative authority.