US Federal Senate Bill SJR91

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/28/25
• Refer: 10/28/25

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision".

Impact

If approved, SJR91 would nullify the rule established by the Bureau of Land Management, thereby halting the implementation of the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program. This would likely have significant implications for energy development in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), shifting the balance of regulatory oversight in a region that is environmentally sensitive and economically important for oil extraction. Proponents argue that the rule imposes unnecessary restrictions on energy exploration, which they believe hinders economic opportunities and energy independence.

Summary

SJR91 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management regarding the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program Record of Decision. The resolution follows the procedures outlined under chapter 8 of title 5 of the United States Code, allowing Congress to negate federal regulations that it finds objectionable. The resolution was introduced by Senator Murkowski and co-sponsored by Senator Sullivan, reflecting a legislative push to modify or eliminate federal policies related to energy exploration in sensitive areas.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR91 is notably polarized. Supporters of the resolution view the congressional disapproval as a necessary step toward furthering energy exploration and economic vitality, pointing to the potential job creation and energy security benefits. Conversely, opponents express concerns about the environmental impacts and the long-term consequences of increased oil drilling in the Coastal Plain, citing potential damage to wildlife and local ecosystems.

Contention

Debate over SJR91 highlights key points of contention, particularly the tension between economic development and environmental conservation. While proponents argue the bill addresses the need for energy resource development, opponents contend that the environmental risks associated with oil and gas leasing—especially in ecologically sensitive areas—outweigh potential economic gains. The contrasting perspectives illustrate an ongoing national conversation regarding energy policies and environmental stewardship.