New York Assembly Bill A10305

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/20/26
• Refer: 2/20/26
• Report Pass: 5/5/26

Caption

Establishes uniform definitions, standardized procedures, and uniform applications or forms, for determining a medical emergency, life-support equipment and designation of elderly, blind and disabled customers protected from termination of utility services.

Impact

The passage of A10305 would significantly impact state laws relating to public utilities and consumer protection. By enacting specific guidelines for service continuation or restoration, the bill is designed to prevent scenarios where individuals facing medical crises or who depend on life-support systems are left without essential utilities. The additions to the law emphasize the need for utility companies to establish clear protocols and maintain effective communication with affected customers. This is particularly vital in regions where service interruptions due to non-payment could have dire health implications.

Summary

Assembly Bill A10305 aims to amend the Public Service Law in New York to provide enhanced protections against the termination of residential utility services, particularly for customers experiencing medical emergencies, those utilizing life-support equipment, and vulnerable populations such as the elderly, blind, or disabled. The bill mandates that utility providers must continue or restore service if termination would exacerbate a medical condition or threaten the safety of these individuals. It provides a framework for defining these emergencies and the responsibilities of both utility companies and health care providers in managing emergencies effectively.

Contention

Opposition to A10305 may center on concerns regarding the financial implications for utility companies and potential exploitation of the new provisions. Critics could argue that broad interpretations of 'medical emergencies' might lead to increased uncontrollable costs for service providers or that the responsibilities outlined may overburden them, particularly smaller companies. Additionally, the debate may encompass the extent to which the state should intervene in service provision, with opponents likely advocating for a more market-driven approach to utility regulation. Nevertheless, proponents advocate that the bill addresses fundamental human rights that need legal safeguarding.