Michigan Senate Bill SB0352

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/4/25
• Refer: 6/4/25
• Report Pass: 12/4/25
• Refer: 12/4/25
• Report Pass: 1/22/26
• Engrossed: 1/29/26
• Refer: 2/3/26

Caption

Civil procedure: costs and fees; filing fees for attorney general in enforcing the telephone solicitation act; prohibit. Amends sec. 2529 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.2529). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0351'25

Impact

The statute imposes a $150 filing fee for most civil actions and appeals, with additional fees applicable for jury trials and cases involving minor custody or support issues. This change is expected to increase revenue for county and state funds that support civil litigation processes. One significant aspect of the bill is its provision for waiving fees for individuals who can demonstrate financial hardship, thus maintaining access to the judicial system for low-income citizens. The legislation is also set to generate funds for the civil filing fee fund, which is used to facilitate court operations.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 352, referred to as SB0352, amends section 2529 of the Revised Judicature Act of 1961, primarily focusing on the filing fees associated with various civil actions in Michigan’s circuit courts. The bill outlines specific fees that individuals must pay when filing different types of cases, including civil actions, appeals, and jury trials. By standardizing these fees, the bill aims to streamline the filing process and ensure consistent enforcement throughout the state's judicial system.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards SB0352 appears to be largely supportive, especially among lawmakers advocating for an efficient judicial system. However, there are concerns regarding the impact of increased fees on individuals who are already financially strained. Critics argue that while fees are necessary for court operations, they may create barriers to justice for some, particularly in family law cases where custody and support determinations are involved. Proponents counter that the revenue generated is essential for maintaining the integrity and function of the judicial branch.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the balance between funding the court system and ensuring accessibility for all citizens. Some lawmakers expressed worries that the fee increases could disproportionately affect low-income families, especially those involved in custody disputes or other family law matters. Proponents of the bill argue that the fee structure is reasonable and necessary for court sustainability. Ultimately, the discussion highlighted an ongoing debate about how best to fund state services while safeguarding access to justice.