California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB903

Introduced
1/21/26  
Refer
2/18/26  
Refer
4/7/26  
Report Pass
4/13/26  
Refer
4/13/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/21/26  
Report Pass
4/21/26  
Refer
4/21/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/19/26  

Caption

Mental health professionals: artificial intelligence.

Impact

The bill will significantly impact existing laws surrounding the practice of psychotherapy in California. It amends the Business and Professions Code to stipulate that mental health professionals can only use AI if patients or their representatives consent to its use. Furthermore, it prohibits AI from making independent therapeutic decisions or engaging directly with clients in any therapeutic communication. This change enhances patient protection and aims to ensure that psychotherapeutic decisions remain firmly in the hands of licensed professionals.

Summary

Senate Bill 903, also known as the Mental Health Professionals: Artificial Intelligence Bill, aims to regulate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of psychotherapy and mental health services. The bill introduces restrictions on how licensed professionals can utilize AI tools in clinical settings, emphasizing the importance of patient consent and notification before any AI engagement. This legislative measure seeks to protect patients by ensuring that only certified and trained individuals provide therapeutic services, thereby preventing unregulated use of AI systems in mental health contexts.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 903 is predominantly supportive among advocates for mental health safety. Proponents argue that the bill addresses vital concerns regarding the emergence of AI technologies in therapeutic environments, reinforcing the integrity and ethics of mental health practices. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders about the implications of such regulations on innovation and the potential benefits of AI if used appropriately in mental health care.

Contention

Some contention exists around the balance between technology's potential benefits and the protection of patient privacy and care quality. Critics fear that overly restrictive measures could hinder the integration of helpful AI tools in mental health settings. Conversely, proponents are cautious about the misuse of AI, emphasizing that the need for human oversight and professional licensing cannot be compromised, ensuring that patients receive safe and competent care.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB489

Health care professions: deceptive terms or letters: artificial intelligence.

CA SB579

Mental health and artificial intelligence working group.

CA AB2575

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

CA HB1139

Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care

CA AB1979

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

CA HB515

Artificial intelligence; regulate use in health coverage decisions

CA HB1195

Psychotherapy Artificial Intelligence Restrictions

CA HB4080

Artificial intelligence; nursing tasks; pilot

CA AB2504

Community colleges: artificial intelligence: pilot program.

CA SB63

Health care plans; to regulate the use of artificial intelligence in determinations of coverage

Similar Bills

CA SB813

California AI Standards and Safety Commission: independent verification organizations.

CA SB420

An act to add Chapter 24.

CA AB1137

Reporting mechanism: child sexual abuse material.

CA SB524

Law enforcement agencies: artificial intelligence.

CA AB1651

State Bar of California: artificial intelligence.

CA AB316

Artificial intelligence: defenses.

CA SB579

Mental health and artificial intelligence working group.

AZ HB2592

Artificial intelligence; state agencies; rules