California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB316

Introduced
1/24/25  
Refer
2/10/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Refer
3/26/25  
Report Pass
4/28/25  
Refer
4/29/25  
Report Pass
5/7/25  
Engrossed
5/19/25  
Refer
5/20/25  
Refer
5/28/25  
Report Pass
6/25/25  
Refer
6/25/25  
Refer
7/7/25  
Report Pass
8/29/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Enrolled
9/9/25  
Chaptered
10/13/25  

Caption

Artificial intelligence: defenses.

Impact

The introduction of AB 316 impacts state laws by reinforcing the principle of personal responsibility in civil actions involving AI. By disallowing the defense that AI acted independently, the bill seeks to ensure that developers remain accountable for the actions and consequences stemming from their technologies. This legislative update comes in response to the growing capabilities of AI systems and aims to provide clarity in the courts regarding liability issues as related to technological advancements.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 316, introduced by Krell, addresses the legal responsibilities associated with artificial intelligence (AI) in California. It amends the Civil Code to include a new section that explicitly states that individuals or entities that develop, modify, or utilize AI cannot use the argument that the AI autonomously caused harm as a defense in civil actions. This move aims to clarify the legal accountability of developers in cases where their AI systems may cause damage or injury.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 316 appears largely supportive among lawmakers concerned with consumer protection and accountability in the tech industry. Many legislators view the bill as a necessary step in adapting state laws to contemporary technological realities, emphasizing the importance of holding developers accountable. However, some voices in the tech community may express concern about how this could stifle innovation or place undue burdens on developers who are striving to integrate advanced AI solutions.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding AB 316 include discussions about the appropriateness of holding developers liable for actions stemming from AI's autonomous functions. Opponents may argue that advancements in AI technology are complex and multifaceted, making it challenging to attribute blame solely to the developer. The debate underscores the delicate balance between encouraging innovation in AI and ensuring adequate consumer protection, which may shape future legislative discussions and amendments concerning AI-related liabilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2575

Health care services: artificial intelligence.

CA H1395

Artificial Intelligence

CA S0482

Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights

CA S0002

Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights

CA SB53

Artificial intelligence models: large developers.

CA SB11

Artificial intelligence technology.

CA SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CA SB318

Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protections

CA SB1159

Artificial intelligence: transparency and governance.

CA HB4080

Artificial intelligence; nursing tasks; pilot

Similar Bills

CA SB813

California AI Standards and Safety Commission: independent verification organizations.

CA SB420

An act to add Chapter 24.

CA AB1137

Reporting mechanism: child sexual abuse material.

CA SB524

Law enforcement agencies: artificial intelligence.

CA AB1651

State Bar of California: artificial intelligence.

CA SB579

Mental health and artificial intelligence working group.

AZ HB2592

Artificial intelligence; state agencies; rules

CA SCR82

Public higher education: artificial intelligence usage.