US Federal Senate Bill SJR86

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/1/25
• Refer: 10/1/25

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Air Plan Approval; South Dakota; Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period".

Impact

If passed, SJR86 would directly influence the regulatory framework governing air quality standards within South Dakota, particularly concerning regional haze. The original EPA rule aimed to address emissions that contribute to regional haze, complying with federal requirements for maintaining visibility in national parks and wilderness areas. Disapproving this rule could lead to less stringent air quality regulations in South Dakota, potentially impacting both public health and environmental quality.

Summary

SJR86 is a joint resolution pertaining to congressional disapproval of a ruling submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) related to the 'Air Plan Approval; South Dakota; Regional Haze Plan for the Second Implementation Period.' This resolution seeks to negate the EPA's ruling, effectively rendering it without force or effect. The intent behind this resolution is to assert congressional authority over regulatory actions taken by the EPA that affect state-level environmental policies.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR86 appears to be contentious, reflecting broader political divides over environmental regulation. Proponents argue that the resolution is necessary for maintaining state autonomy and promoting local interests. In contrast, opponents emphasize the importance of federal standards in ensuring clear air quality and protecting health. This division can be seen as indicative of larger debates over the role of the federal government versus state governments in environmental governance.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SJR86 include the implications for environmental protection measures and the degree to which states should be allowed to dictate their own regulatory standards without federal input. Supporters claim that disapproving the EPA's ruling will empower state lawmakers to make decisions that are more in line with local economic interests, while opponents warn that such actions could undermine necessary environmental protections, resulting in long-term detrimental effects on public health and natural resources.