US Federal Senate Bill SJR31

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Engrossed: 5/5/25
• Enrolled: 6/10/25
• Passed: 6/20/25
• Chaptered: 6/20/25

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Review of Final Rule Reclassification of Major Sources as Area Sources Under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act".

Impact

If enacted, SJR31 would render the EPA's rule ineffective, thereby maintaining the previous classification criteria for major sources of pollutants. This could have significant implications for air quality management and public health, as it may limit the scope of regulations that enforce stricter controls over air pollution from industrial sources. By disapproving this rule, Congress could influence how states and localities regulate air quality and manage environmental health risks.

Summary

SJR31 is a joint resolution aimed at disapproving a specific rule set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) concerning the reclassification of major sources as area sources under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act. The resolution reflects Congress's power to nullify federal regulations it finds undesirable or overreaching. Its introduction comes in response to concerns from various stakeholders about potential implications for pollution control and regulatory burdens on industries.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR31 is divided among legislators and interest groups. Proponents see the resolution as a necessary check on federal authority, arguing that it preserves local control over environmental regulations. They contend that the EPA's rule may impose undue constraints on economic activities. Conversely, opponents argue that disapproving the rule undermines efforts to ensure clean air and protect public health, suggesting that it could lead to increased pollution levels and environmental degradation.

Contention

A notable point of contention involves the balance between economic interests and environmental protection. The debate reflects broader themes in U.S. politics regarding the role of federal versus state authority in environmental regulation. Supporters of SJR31 often emphasize the need for a regulatory environment that supports industry, while critics highlight the potential risks to air quality and public health posed by loosening regulatory measures established by the EPA.