US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB93

Introduced
1/3/25  

Caption

Stop Imposing Woke Ideology Abroad ActThis bill prohibits using federal funds for the Department of State's Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice. (The special representative's duties include leading the State Department's efforts to combat systemic racism and discrimination around the world.)The bill also prohibits using federal funds to implement the State Department's Equity Action Plan. (The plan outlines actions and metrics related to addressing issues of equity, including racial equity, in the State Department's foreign affairs mission.)

Impact

If passed, HB 93 would significantly impact the operations of the Department of State regarding its initiatives that focus on racial equity and justice. By prohibiting funding for the Special Representative, the bill could halt efforts aimed at implementing the Equity Action Plan, ultimately affecting the U.S.'s approach to international human rights advocacy. This legislation reflects a growing division in Congress regarding the political implications of promoting social justice abroad and could command substantial debate about the extent of federal involvement in international equity initiatives.

Summary

House Bill 93, titled the 'Stop Imposing Woke Ideology Abroad Act', aims to prohibit federal funding allocated to the Special Representative for Racial Equity and Justice within the Department of State. Introduced by Mr. Biggs of Arizona, the bill seeks to address concerns that such funding promotes ideological agendas that some legislators deem unnecessary or inappropriate in the context of U.S. foreign policy. The bill intends to reallocate federal resources and reshape how the United States engages with issues of racial equity on an international scale.

Contention

The discussions surrounding HB 93 highlight a contentious debate over the role of government in promoting racial justice through diplomacy. Proponents of the bill argue that taxpayer dollars should not subsidize what they consider 'woke ideologies', while opponents contend that such measures are essential for fostering global dialogue on equality and human rights. This split between the two parties reflects broader societal divisions over issues of social justice, systemic bias, and the responsibilities of the United States as a global leader in these matters.

Congress_id

119-HR-93

Policy_area

International Affairs

Introduced_date

2025-01-03

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

US HR540

Supporting the values of the Equity or Else quality-of-life platform and acknowledging the need for the House of Representatives to use the platform as a holistic framework for drafting and implementing policy that promotes racial and economic equity for all across various social issues.

US HB461

Eliminate DEI in the Military Act This bill prohibits the use of federal funds for diversity, equity, and inclusion activities (e.g., training) of the Armed Forces, national service academies, or the Department of Defense.

US AB766

State agencies and departments: strategic plans: diversity, equity, and inclusion.

US HSB155

A bill for an act prohibiting state entities from expending moneys to fund diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or to hire individuals to serve as diversity, equity, and inclusion officers, creating a private cause of action, and including effective date provisions.(See HF 856.)

US HB1998

Prohibits educational institutions from using state funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion purposes

US HB742

Prohibits state departments from spending money on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives

US HB927

This bill prohibits an institution of higher education (IHE) that participates in federal student aid programs from requiring a student enrolled at the IHE, an employee or contractor of the IHE, or an applicant for admission to or employment or contracting at the IHE to make certain ideological oaths or similar statements.Specifically, the bill prohibits an IHE from compelling, requiring, inducing, or soliciting such an individual to (1) endorse an ideology that promotes the differential treatment of an individual or group of individuals based on race, color, or ethnicity; or (2) provide a statement indicating certain information about the individual, including the individual's views on efforts involving diversity, equity, and inclusion or other specified concepts.Additionally, the bill prohibits an IHE from providing preferential consideration to a student, employee, or contractor based on the individual's unsolicited support for an ideology that promotes the differential treatment of an individual or group of individuals based on race, color, or ethnicity.

US HB987

In miscellaneous provisions relating to institutions of higher education, providing for prohibitions regarding ideological oaths or statements, for prohibition on diversity, equity and inclusion offices and employees, for statements required to be included in mission statement, bylaws, faculty handbook and student handbook, for certain mandatory training prohibited, for revoking tenure for diversity, equity and inclusion violations and for spending restricted; and imposing penalties.

US H6287

Requires statements as to whether a bill is likely to increase equity, decrease equity or have no impact on equity to be included on up to 20 pieces of legislation.

US HB1901

Providing for the Office of Health Equity; establishing the Health Equity Advisory Committee; and imposing duties on the Department of Health.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.