Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB149

Filed
3/14/25  
Out of House Committee
4/10/25  
Voted on by House
4/23/25  
Out of Senate Committee
5/21/25  
Voted on by Senate
5/23/25  
Governor Action
6/22/25  

Caption

Relating to regulation of the use of artificial intelligence systems in this state; providing civil penalties.

Impact

The passage of HB 149 is expected to significantly impact state laws governing artificial intelligence and data privacy. It primarily addresses concerns regarding the use of biometric data in AI systems, requiring explicit consent from individuals for data capture and use. Local regulations concerning AI are preempted, meaning that any local ordinances will not hold if they conflict with state laws regarding AI, which has raised concerns among advocates for local governance authority. Moreover, the bill establishes a regulatory sandbox for testing AI innovations, enabling safe experimentation without immediate regulatory burdens.

Summary

House Bill 149, known as the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act, seeks to regulate the use of artificial intelligence systems within the state of Texas. Its primary objective is to establish a framework that promotes the ethical deployment of AI technologies while ensuring public safety and individual freedoms. The bill introduces civil penalties for non-compliance, thus incentivizing organizations to adhere to the outlined guidelines. It mandates disclosures for consumers interacting with AI systems and prohibits the development of AI that encourages harmful behaviors or social scoring.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding HB 149 remains mixed among legislators and stakeholders. Supporters advocate for its potential to protect consumers and ensure responsible innovation within the rapidly evolving AI landscape. Conversely, critics express concerns about the bill's implications for local control and question whether the regulatory approach may stifle innovation rather than promote it. This division reflects a broader debate over the balance between necessary regulation and fostering an environment conducive to technological advancement.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the scope and definition of what constitutes an artificial intelligence system, the ethical guidelines for its use, and the civil penalties imposed on violators. Some legislators believe the penalties could be overly punitive, while others argue they are necessary to enforce compliance and protect the public. The creation of the Texas Artificial Intelligence Council is also under scrutiny; its role and authority in overseeing AI deployment and ensuring ethical standards may evolve based on future legislative sessions and the council's recommendations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX HB1725

Relative to the regulation of artificial intelligence technologies.

TX SB1324

Creates regulations of artificially generated online content using artificial intelligence

TX HB2500

Relating To Artificial Intelligence.

TX HSB294

A bill for an act relating to artificial intelligence, including the use of artificial intelligence to create materials related to elections and protections in interactions with artificial intelligence systems, and making penalties applicable.

TX HB3755

Relating to biometric identifiers used in the performance of artificial intelligence.

TX SB2490

Relating to biometric identifiers used in the performance of artificial intelligence.

TX SB1964

Relating to the regulation and use of artificial intelligence systems and the management of data by governmental entities.

TX HB1009

Artificial Intelligence Systems

TX HB712

Civil Actions - Product Liability - Artificial Intelligence Systems

TX HF3893

Use of artificial intelligence in psychotherapy services regulated, and civil penalties provided.

Similar Bills

HI SB2212

Relating To Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education.

HI HB1887

Relating To Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education.

CA SB813

California AI Standards and Safety Commission: independent verification organizations.

HI SB2923

Relating To Artificial Intelligence.

NJ A4352

Requires school districts to provide instruction on artificial intelligence; requires Secretary of Higher Education to develop artificial intelligence model curricula.

NJ S2860

Establishes Artificial Intelligence Apprenticeship Program and artificial intelligence apprenticeship tax credit program.

CA SB420

An act to add Chapter 24.

CA AB1137

Reporting mechanism: child sexual abuse material.