New York Assembly Bill A10460

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/26
• Refer: 3/6/26

Caption

Enacts the "ICE contract transparency act"; creates a publicly accessible database for contracts made between United States immigration and customs enforcement and private entities conducting business in the state of New York; requires entities to provide the department of state with a copy of contracts made between U.S. immigration and customs enforcement and private entities operating in the state of New York.

Impact

The establishment of a publicly accessible database for these contracts aims to ensure greater accountability and transparency regarding the operations of private entities involved in immigration enforcement in New York. The database will include important details such as the name of the entity, location, the nature of the contracts, and any other relevant information as set by the Department of State. This initiative is likely to garner public interest given the contentious nature of immigration enforcement and the growing demand for government transparency in these operations.

Summary

Bill A10460, known as the 'ICE Contract Transparency Act', proposes amendments to the executive law to establish a more transparent framework for contracts between private entities and federal immigration enforcement agencies, specifically the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Under this act, any entity that enters into a contract with ICE for services related to immigration enforcement must file that contract with the New York Department of State within thirty days of execution. This provision applies to contracts initiated on or after January 1, 2025, and includes diverse agreements such as those for leasing or operating immigration detention facilities.

Contention

Debates surrounding Bill A10460 may center on the implications of increased oversight of contracts with federal agencies. Proponents argue that the transparency required by this bill will help curb abuses and ensure that services related to immigration enforcement are conducted ethically and responsibly. Conversely, critics may express concerns regarding the burden of compliance on private entities and argue that excessive oversight can hinder necessary services. The potential penalties for non-compliance, which can reach up to five thousand dollars, could also be a point of debate among stakeholders regarding its fairness and impact on business operations.