New York Assembly Bill A08399

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/13/25
• Refer: 5/13/25
• Report Pass: 5/28/25
• Refer: 5/28/25
• Report Pass: 5/29/25
• Engrossed: 5/29/25
• Refer: 5/29/25
• Engrossed: 3/9/26
• Refer: 3/9/26

Caption

Relates to solicitation of donations on state highways.

Impact

The implementation of this legislation is expected to provide clearer guidelines around how solicitation can occur on state highways. One of the significant implications is the establishment of age restrictions on who can solicit donations on these highways. Moreover, while the bill grants exceptions for certain organizations, it retains the authority of local laws or ordinances, which can prohibit solicitation entirely in specific areas. This could impact various local fundraising initiatives and emergency service fundraising activities that rely on highway solicitation.

Summary

Bill A08399 seeks to amend the vehicle and traffic law concerning the solicitation of donations on state highways. Specifically, it proposes that no individual may occupy any part of a state highway for the purpose of selling or soliciting in towns not contained within the geographical boundaries of a city or village. Exceptions are made for individuals aged eighteen and older soliciting on behalf of fire companies, voluntary ambulance services, or organizations that are tax-exempt under section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code, provided that the highways have a speed limit not exceeding thirty miles per hour.

Contention

During discussions surrounding Bill A08399, notable points of contention emerged regarding the balance between facilitating fundraising for essential services and maintaining public safety on state highways. Proponents argue that regulated solicitation is necessary to support community services like fire departments and ambulances, while critics emphasize that such activities can pose risks to drivers and solicitors alike. Additionally, the authority granted to local governments to impose stricter regulations has raised concerns about inconsistent application and potential legal disparities in enforcement.