Oregon 2025 Regular Session

Oregon House Bill HB3865

Introduced
2/27/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Report Pass
4/4/25  
Engrossed
4/14/25  
Refer
4/14/25  
Report Pass
6/4/25  
Refer
6/4/25  
Report Pass
6/23/25  
Enrolled
6/24/25  
Enrolled
6/25/25  
Passed
7/24/25  
Chaptered
8/13/25  

Caption

Relating to telephone solicitations.

Impact

The passage of HB 3865 would significantly alter the legal landscape surrounding telemarketing practices. It would strengthen existing regulations, requiring telemarketers to adhere to tighter rules regarding disclosure and consumer consent. This bill would also potentially enhance the efficacy of the Do Not Call registry, ensuring that consumers have a clearer path to avoid unwanted calls. Overall, the bill's implementation would likely lead to a decrease in unsolicited marketing calls and a greater emphasis on consumer rights.

Summary

House Bill 3865 addresses the growing concerns surrounding telephone solicitations, primarily focusing on regulating telemarketing practices to protect consumers from unsolicited calls. The bill outlines specific provisions that aim to enhance transparency in telemarketing operations, establish stricter guidelines for companies making such calls, and provide consumers with more robust tools to opt-out of unwanted solicitations. By doing so, it seeks to create a more consumer-friendly environment and reduce the frequency of nuisance calls that disturb residents.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 3865 appears to be positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and regular citizens who have often been the target of unwanted telemarketing calls. Supporters believe that the bill will empower consumers, improve communication practices within the telemarketing industry, and ultimately lead to a more respectful interaction between businesses and consumers. However, there are concerns among some telemarketers and business groups about the potential negative impacts on their operations, citing that stricter regulations might hinder legitimate outreach efforts.

Contention

Debates surrounding HB 3865 have highlighted potential points of contention related to the balance between consumer protection and business rights. Critics of the bill argue that while consumer interests must be safeguarded, the telemarketing industry plays an essential role in many business models, and overly stringent measures could stifle growth opportunities for businesses that rely on telemarketing. The challenge lies in finding a compromise that upholds consumer rights while ensuring that businesses can still operate effectively and reach their target audiences.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TN HB2225

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39; Title 47 and Title 65, relative to consumer protection.

TN SB2209

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39; Title 47 and Title 65, relative to consumer protection.

CA SB716

An act to add and repeal Section Sections 873.

NC H936

Robocall Solicitation Modifications

MI SB0351

Consumer protection: marketing and advertising; telephone solicitation act; create. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0352'25, SB 0353'25, SB 0354'25, SB 0355'25

ME LD647

An Act Regarding Telephone and Video Call Access in Detention and Correctional Facilities and Jails

NJ S1086

Establishes a senior citizens telephone chat-line.

NJ A991

Establishes a senior citizens telephone chat-line.