New York Assembly Bill A06745

New York 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/25
• Refer: 3/11/25
• Report Pass: 4/30/25
• Refer: 4/30/25
• Report Pass: 5/28/25
• Refer: 5/28/25
• Report Pass: 6/6/25
• Refer: 6/6/25
• Report Pass: 6/13/25

Caption

Prohibits online sweepstakes games and revenue from illegal markets; sets penalties; provides for enforcement of provisions.

Impact

The enactment of Bill A06745 is expected to significantly change the legal landscape for online gaming in New York. By prohibiting any form of promoting or conducting online sweepstakes games, the legislation seeks to deter entities from exploiting loopholes in existing gaming laws. It empowers the New York State Gaming Commission and the Attorney General's Office to enforce these regulations rigorously and impose substantial fines ranging between $10,000 and $100,000 for violations. These funds are aimed to contribute to the state's commercial gaming revenue, particularly for problem gambling education and treatment.

Summary

Bill A06745 seeks to amend the current racing, pari-mutuel wagering, and breeding laws in New York by explicitly prohibiting online sweepstakes games and any revenue derived from illegal gaming activities. The bill's primary aim is to establish clear legal boundaries regarding what constitutes allowable forms of online gaming, responding to growing concerns about the legality and fairness of unregulated sweepstakes games. With the increase of digital platforms, the bill addresses a critical gap by defining 'online sweepstakes games' and the conditions under which their operation is banned.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention surrounding Bill A06745 is its potential impact on individuals and companies that may currently operate within the grey areas of online sweepstakes. Critics may argue that the bill could hinder legitimate businesses operating national gaming platforms by tightening regulations that could stifle competition and innovation. Supporters, however, maintain that the legislation is necessary to ensure consumer protection and to uphold the integrity of the state's gaming framework, calling for stricter controls on entities that might circumvent existing laws fostering illegal markets.