Minnesota House Bill HF2513

Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/20/25
• Refer: 3/20/25

Caption

Process to select delegates to attend an amendment convention held under Article V of the United States Constitution established.

Impact

HF2513 impacts state laws by codifying the selection process of delegates who will represent Minnesota at a national level constitutional amendment convention. It stipulates clear qualifications that delegates must meet, which aims to ensure that appointed individuals are experienced and knowledgeable about the legislative process. The provision that delegates cannot hold specific federal positions or lobbying roles helps maintain the integrity and autonomy of the state's representation during the convention. Furthermore, the delegation is required to operate within limits set by the legislature, reinforcing state control over the delegation's actions.

Summary

HF2513 establishes a formal process for Minnesota to select delegates to attend an amendment convention under Article V of the United States Constitution. This legislation outlines specific criteria for delegate eligibility, including requirements for citizenship, residency, age, and political activity. The bill mandates that Minnesota must send five delegates, with each appointed by various legislative leaders, ensuring a diverse representation from the state’s legislative body. Additionally, the legislation allows for the appointment of alternate delegates to cover potential vacancies.

Contention

Debate surrounding HF2513 may focus on the authority and restrictions imposed on delegates, particularly regarding their ability to propose changes to certain constitutional guarantees. The requirement that delegates cannot vote for amendments affecting specific rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights could create contention among advocates for constitutional change. Critics might argue that such limitations could hinder more progressive amendments that might arise during the convention process. The bill also outlines mechanisms for the oversight of delegate conduct, raising questions about accountability and the checks on delegation power.