Michigan House Bill HB5654

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/3/26
• Refer: 3/3/26

Caption

Weapons: firearms; 1927 PA 372; update references. Amends secs. 2, 2a, 5b, 5o, 12 & 15 of 1927 PA 372 (MCL 28.422 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5653'26

Impact

The amendments introduced by HB 5654 impact several existing laws relating to firearm ownership and use. Notably, it establishes stricter requirements for individuals seeking to acquire firearms, including mandatory background checks and the establishment of penalties for violations related to the improper possession or transfer of firearms. This is part of a broader push to ensure that firearms are kept out of the hands of individuals deemed potentially dangerous, such as those with felony convictions or certain mental health issues. Furthermore, it addresses procedures for the forfeiture of firearms under specific circumstances, reinforcing accountability for firearm possession.

Summary

House Bill 5654 proposes significant amendments to the regulation and licensing of firearms, focusing particularly on the sale, purchase, possession, and carrying of firearms, gas ejecting devices, and electro-muscular disruption devices in Michigan. The bill aims to update legal references and establish a clear set of rules that govern how these items are to be managed in the state. It outlines the licensing processes individuals must undergo, which include obtaining permits for various firearm-related activities, thereby aiming to enhance public safety through regulated access to firearms.

Contention

While proponents of HB 5654 argue that the bill is essential for improving public safety and responsible gun ownership, there are notable points of contention. Opponents argue that stricter regulations may infringe upon individual rights to bear arms as outlined in the Second Amendment. Concerns have been raised about the potential for this bill to disproportionately impact law-abiding citizens who wish to exercise their rights responsibly. Furthermore, critics question the effectiveness of creating more regulation around firearms without addressing underlying issues related to violence and crime in the community.