California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB46

Introduced
1/29/25  
Introduced
12/12/24  
Refer
1/29/25  
Refer
1/5/26  
Refer
1/5/26  
Report Pass
1/13/26  
Refer
1/13/26  
Report Pass
1/14/26  
Report Pass
1/13/26  
Refer
1/14/26  
Refer
1/13/26  
Report Pass
1/22/26  
Report Pass
1/14/26  
Engrossed
1/27/26  
Refer
1/14/26  
Report Pass
1/14/26  
Refer
1/14/26  
Report Pass
1/22/26  
Engrossed
1/27/26  
Report Pass
1/22/26  

Caption

Presidential elections: qualifications for office.

Impact

This bill expands the authority of the Secretary of State to investigate candidates if there is reasonable suspicion that they do not meet the qualifications. It allows for elector-driven challenges to a candidate's qualifications, enabling residents to contest decisions regarding ballot placements through a petition process in the County of Sacramento superior court. These changes are significant as they shift some power to the electorate while also establishing stricter qualifications that candidates must adhere to before appearing on the ballot.

Summary

Senate Bill 46, introduced by Senator Umberg, aims to amend various sections of the Elections Code and the Evidence Code concerning the qualifications for candidates seeking the office of President or Vice President. The bill stipulates that the Secretary of State must not place a candidate's name on the ballot unless the candidate affirms, under oath, that they meet all constitutional requirements for the office. This is designed to ensure that only qualified candidates are eligible for election, thereby making the electoral process more accountable.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 46 is mixed, reflecting a divergence between those who believe in stricter electoral integrity measures and those who argue these measures could lead to disenfranchisement. Proponents argue it fortifies candidate eligibility and public trust in the electoral process. However, opponents raise concerns over potential misuse of the investigative authority and the implications for candidates, particularly those from less recognized backgrounds who may struggle to affirm compliance under the new stipulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of perjury for candidates based on the requirement for sworn statements regarding qualifications, alongside the challenges that could arise for individuals seeking to contest candidates' qualifications. The dichotomy of candidate access and integrity assurance presents a critical issue, with advocates on both sides arguing passionately over their views on electoral fairness and security.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB1539

Presidential elections: qualifications for office.

CA AB1214

Elections: official canvass.

CA SB407

Elections: official canvass.

CA HB1113

Modifications to Elections

CA SB851

Elections.

CA HB05531

An Act Concerning Faithful Presidential Electors.

CA SB1141

Presidential electors; presidential candidates; vacancy

CA SB1687

Voter access; elections; primary date

CA AB502

An act to amend Section 20012 of the Elections Code, relating to elections.

CA AB868

Primary elections: county officers: top two candidates.

Similar Bills

CA SB493

An act to amend Section 4508 of the Food and Agricultural Code, relating to fairs.

AR SB63

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning Reports By The Secretaries Of Cabinet-level Departments On The State Of Their Departments.

CA AB655

An act to amend Section 99522 of the Government Code, relating to state government.

DE HB400

An Act To Amend Title 5, Title 6, Title 8, Title 12, And Title 29 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Fees And Taxes Administered By The Secretary Of State.

CA AB459

Initiatives: qualification: electronic signatures.

CA AB1764

Elections: voter registration.

CA AB2778

Food and agriculture.

CA AB1188

Elections: statewide initiative and referendum petitions: disclosures.