California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB868

Introduced
2/19/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
3/24/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Report Pass
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
4/3/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/22/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Refer
4/23/25  
Report Pass
4/2/25  
Failed
2/2/26  
Refer
4/3/25  

Caption

Primary elections: county officers: top two candidates.

Impact

This bill is anticipated to significantly affect the voting dynamics in California, as it addresses long-standing issues of voter inequity, especially among underrepresented populations. Primary elections in California have historically seen lower turnout rates compared to general elections, particularly among younger individuals and communities of color. AB868 aims to mitigate this problem by ensuring that a more diverse group of candidates appear on the general election ballot, thereby promoting broader electoral engagement and representation. By imposing additional duties on counties, it establishes a state-mandated program that is subject to reimbursement, which could also have fiscal implications for local governments.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 868, introduced by Assembly Member Carrillo, proposes amendments to the California Elections Code, particularly focusing on the election processes for nonpartisan county officers. The bill seeks to exempt candidates for county nonpartisan offices from the current majority vote requirement to secure a position in the ensuing general election. Instead, it mandates that the top two candidates from the primary election will be placed on the general election ballot, aiming to enhance voter representation and participation in local governance.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around AB868 appears to be supportive among proponents who argue that it will enhance democratic participation and rectify imbalances in voter representation. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential administrative burdens placed on county election officials. Critics fear that mandated changes might complicate the local election administration processes. The bill reflects a commitment to increasing electoral access and fairness that resonates with the values of equity and inclusion in civic participation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications this bill might have for traditional voting patterns and how it could affect the decision-making autonomy of individual counties. Opponents argue that exempting certain county offices from the standard primary election process may undermine established electoral practices. Nevertheless, supporters posit that shifting to a top-two system for these offices could ultimately lead to a more representative government that reflects California's diverse demographic.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA HB2376

County candidates; clean elections pamphlet

CA HB2844

Multiple nonpartisan candidates; primary

CA HB541

Primary Elections; require political party registration to vote in primary or primary runoff elections

CA AB1392

Elections: voter registration information: elected officials and candidates.

CA SB1536

Cities and towns; primary elections

CA SB1687

Voter access; elections; primary date

CA HB4059

Open primary election

CA HB2022

Elections; July primary; curing; observers

CA SB1425

Elections; July primary; curing; observers.

CA SB280

Elections.

Similar Bills

CA AB1093

An act to add and repeal Chapter 2.

CA AB977

California Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 2001: California State University: burial sites: human remains.

CA AB1769

Student transfer: tribal colleges.

CA AB466

An act to add Section 66027.

CA AB831

Gambling: operation of a contest or sweepstakes.

CA AB2539

Tribal-state gaming compacts: ratification.

CA AB713

Public postsecondary education: student employment.

CA AB2694

Public postsecondary education: community colleges: statewide baccalaureate degree program.