California Assembly Bill AB406

California 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/25
• Refer: 2/24/25
• Report Pass: 3/4/25
• Refer: 3/5/25
• Report Pass: 3/27/25
• Refer: 3/27/25
• Report Pass: 4/23/25
• Engrossed: 5/1/25
• Refer: 5/1/25
• Refer: 5/14/25
• Report Pass: 6/23/25
• Refer: 6/23/25
• Refer: 6/24/25
• Refer: 6/25/25
• Report Pass: 6/27/25
• Refer: 6/27/25
• Report Pass: 7/9/25
• Refer: 7/9/25
• Report Pass: 7/16/25
• Refer: 7/16/25
• Refer: 9/4/25
• Enrolled: 9/11/25
• Chaptered: 10/1/25
• Passed: 10/1/25

Caption

Employment: unlawful discrimination: victims of violence.

Impact

With the amendments imposed, AB 406 significantly impacts existing employment laws in California, particularly those related to job protections during instances of violence affecting employees. It allows employees to take leave for varied reasons linked to their status as victims, which is critical in ensuring their safety and welfare. This bill reinstates and clarifies enforcement responsibilities that were previously held by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement, and now emphasizes protection from discrimination and retaliation by employers. These reinforcements align more closely with contemporary understanding and recognition of the challenges victims face, creating a more supportive framework within employment law.

Summary

Assembly Bill 406, introduced by Schiavo, amends provisions under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, particularly concerning unlawful discrimination against victims of violence. The bill seeks to reinforce protections for employees who are victims or have family members who are victims of qualifying acts of violence. This includes allowing these individuals to take time off work to attend judicial proceedings, seek medical attention, or obtain relief such as restraining orders without fear of retaliation from their employers. The bill also establishes specific rules regarding the notice employees must provide when taking such time off, ensuring that they have the necessary rights and flexibility to address their circumstances.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AB 406 appears mostly supportive, especially from groups advocating for victim's rights and workplace fairness. Proponents argue that it is a necessary step in acknowledging the struggles faced by victims of violence and allowing them the time and resources they need to recover without fear of losing employment. However, there are concerns from some employers about the potential for abuse of these provisions, which may lead to increased costs and operational challenges in managing employee absences. Overall, the conversation reflects a strong desire to balance victim protections with employer interests.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the discussions around AB 406 revolve around the balance of employee rights and employer responsibilities. Critics highlight potential misuse of the leave provisions and express concern regarding the administrative burden that may fall on employers, particularly small businesses. Supporters counter these points by emphasizing the legal safeguards in place to prevent misuse and the overall moral imperative to protect those affected by violence. The urgency for immediate enactment also sparked debate, as some felt that allowing for more deliberative consideration could yield important insights into the bill's long-term implications for the workforce.