California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1802

Introduced
2/10/26  
Refer
3/16/26  
Refer
4/6/26  
Report Pass
4/15/26  
Refer
4/15/26  
Report Pass
4/23/26  
Refer
4/23/26  
Refer
5/6/26  
Report Pass
5/14/26  
Engrossed
5/22/26  

Caption

Land use: mitigation lands.

Impact

The bill is designed to have a significant impact on California's land use laws by ensuring the continuation of practices surrounding the management of lands dedicated for conservation and the mitigation of environmental impacts. Supporters argue that maintaining these provisions will foster effective environmental stewardship and proper funding mechanisms for conservation projects. Furthermore, it is anticipated that this will simplify processes for acquiring permits and approvals, making it easier for governmental agencies and organizations involved in conservation to manage these assets efficiently.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1802, introduced by Assembly Member Stefani on February 10, 2026, aims to amend Section 65968 of California's Government Code. This amendment seeks to extend indefinitely the provisions that authorize state and local public agencies to designate various entities, such as governmental entities, special districts, and nonprofit organizations, to hold title and manage interests in property meant for mitigation purposes. Currently, existing provisions related to endowments tied to these properties are set to expire on January 1, 2027, but AB 1802 intends to remove this expiration date, ensuring long-term stewardship of such properties.

Conclusion

In conclusion, AB 1802 is a legislative effort to provide stability and clarity regarding the management of lands designated for environmental mitigation. By ensuring that endowment provisions do not lapse, the bill aims to enhance the state's ability to address environmental impacts through structured management of vital conservation properties.

Contention

Notably, there are potential areas of contention surrounding the bill. While proponents emphasize the importance of ongoing management for mitigation lands, critics may argue that extending provisions indefinitely could lead to less oversight or accountability over how these funds are managed. Additionally, there may be concerns regarding how the permanent assignment of responsibilities affects local governments and communities involved in mitigation efforts, particularly if these entities feel they lack control over their own land use decisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA SB358

Mitigation Fee Act: mitigating vehicular traffic impacts.

CA HB1009

Vegetative Fuel Mitigation

CA AB2139

Surplus lands: exempt surplus land: City of Ontario.

CA AB807

Conservation and mitigation bank: marine artificial reefs.

CA SB304

Public lands: City of Oakland: Port of Oakland: uses of after-acquired lands.

CA HB2201

Wildfire mitigation planning; utilities; approval

CA SB139

Land; Ownership Restrictions; Ag Land

CA HB2755

State land use; highest; best

CA SB1036

Mitigation Fee Act.

CA AB2525

Surplus lands: Mission Bay Park.

Similar Bills

CA SB1352

Property taxation: newly constructed: reconstructed property.

CA AB245

Property taxation: application of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB1053

Property taxation: transfer of base year value: disaster relief.

CA SB603

An act to amend Section 69 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, relating to taxation, to take effect immediately, tax levy.

CA AB385

Regional park property: County of San Bernardino: Glen Helen Regional Park.

CA AB1262

Stolen or embezzled property: description.

AZ HB2261

Property tax; agricultural real property

CA SB288

Property taxation: change in ownership: family homes and farms.