California 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2139

Introduced
2/18/26  
Refer
3/9/26  
Report Pass
4/7/26  
Refer
4/8/26  
Report Pass
4/16/26  
Refer
4/16/26  
Report Pass
4/16/26  
Refer
4/20/26  
Report Pass
4/23/26  

Caption

Surplus lands: exempt surplus land: City of Ontario.

Impact

The legislation will allow the City of Ontario greater flexibility to manage its surplus public land in the context of a larger development strategy geared towards economic and recreational benefits. By enabling the local agency to declare specific lands exempt from the standard disposal requirements, the city aims to streamline processes for developing mixed-use properties that integrate sports, recreation, and other public amenities. This strategic approach is seen as essential to fostering public-private partnerships necessary for implementing large-scale projects designed to bolster local economic development and job creation.

Summary

AB 2139, introduced by Assembly Member Garcia, seeks to amend Section 54221 of the Government Code regarding the management of surplus lands by local agencies. Specifically, the bill aims to expand the definition of exempt surplus land to include certain properties owned by the City of Ontario, particularly those in the Ontario Sports Empire, a designated sports and entertainment district. This exemption would facilitate the disposal of land for purposes that align with a comprehensive development plan, provided specific conditions are met regarding the funding and notification process for the proposed land use changes.

Sentiment

The reaction to AB 2139 has been largely supportive among city officials and proponents of economic development who argue that the bill will allow for timely and coordinated development within the Ontario Sports Empire. They believe it will attract significant investment and generate community benefits. Conversely, critics of the bill may raise concerns about the potential implications for housing if properties traditionally slated for residential use are diverted towards commercial developments, resulting in a potential decrease in affordable housing options in the area.

Contention

One point of contention surrounding AB 2139 is the potential exclusion of residential developments from the newly defined exempt surplus land category. Critics of the bill fear that this could diminish the availability of land for affordable housing amid California's ongoing housing crisis. Additionally, the bill imposes new requirements for local notification and compliance, with penalties for any violation of these provisions, which could create tensions between local agencies and state oversight.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB76

Surplus land: exempt surplus land: sectional planning area.

CA AB2498

Exempt surplus land: surplus land subject to a valid legal restriction.

CA AB2512

Surplus Land Act: exemption: Angel Stadium.

CA SB1317

Exempt surplus land: locally owned land

CA AB1895

Surplus Land Act: exemptions: land unsuitable for housing.

CA AB2525

Surplus lands: Mission Bay Park.

CA AB1420

Surplus land.

CA AB1947

Surplus land.

CA SB1145

California Environmental Quality Act: surplus land disposal requirements: exemption.

CA SB273

Surplus land.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.