Alabama House Bill HB67

Alabama 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/17/25
• Introduced: 1/13/26
• Refer: 11/17/25
• Refer: 1/13/26
• Report Pass: 1/21/26
• Engrossed: 2/5/26
• Refer: 2/5/26
• Report Pass: 2/10/26
• Enrolled: 4/9/26
• Passed: 4/17/26

Caption

Voter Information; limit cost of reproducing voter registration list; crime for misuse of personal voter information; created

Impact

The enactment of HB67 is expected to have significant implications for how voter information is distributed and used in Alabama. By prohibiting the sale or commercial use of voter data, the bill seeks to maintain the integrity of voter information and prevent misuse for commercial purposes. This change is seen as an important step towards protecting voters' personal data and reinforcing trust in the electoral process. The bill also ensures that various governmental agencies can access this information for lawful purposes, albeit under strict controls.

Summary

House Bill 67, which amends Section 17-4-38 of the Code of Alabama, is primarily focused on establishing guidelines for the dissemination of voter registration information. One of the key provisions of the bill is the limitation on the reproduction cost for registered voter lists, capped at $1,000. This aims to enhance access to voter information while ensuring that the costs do not become prohibitively high for those who wish to obtain it. The bill also stipulates that certain personal information pertaining to voters, such as Social Security numbers and email addresses, shall remain confidential and not be disseminated, thereby protecting the privacy of individuals.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB67 appears to be generally positive, with support from various legislators who feel that it strikes a necessary balance between transparency and privacy. Advocates of the bill argue that it is vital for electoral integrity, ensuring that voters' rights are protected while still allowing for the necessary governmental functions related to voter management. However, some critics voice concerns that the limitations on data dissemination might hinder certain forms of research and analysis that require comprehensive access to voter information.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention discussed during the bill's consideration is the extent to which public access to voter registration information should be allowed. While supporters claim that enhancing access supports democratic engagement and electoral transparency, opponents worry that too much accessibility could lead to privacy violations and misuse of sensitive information. Additionally, there is a debate over the implications of restricting certain data sharing practices between states and local governments, which may affect collaborative efforts in managing voter registration across state lines.