US Federal Senate Bill SJR82

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/18/25
• Refer: 9/18/25

Caption

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services relating to "Policy on Adhering to the Text of the Administrative Procedure Act".

Impact

The passing of SJR82 would effectively nullify the specified rule from the Department of Health and Human Services, preventing it from having any legal force or effect. This action could lead to significant changes in how the Department addresses compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act, which is a fundamental law ensuring that federal agencies follow fair and transparent processes when making rules. The resolution reflects a broader concern within Congress regarding the executive branch's regulatory powers and may signal a push for a more stringent oversight of administrative rules.

Summary

SJR82 is a joint resolution that aims to express congressional disapproval of a rule established by the Office of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services regarding the adherence to the Administrative Procedure Act. The resolution is a significant legislative move, as it relies on the authority granted by chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, which allows Congress to disapprove certain agency rules. By passing this resolution, Congress intends to invalidate the specific rule that was published on March 3, 2025, which had been confirmed as a rule by the Government Accountability Office in a letter dated August 27, 2025.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR82 appears to align with a critical assessment of the current regulatory environment as perceived by many legislators, particularly those in the majority. Supporters of the resolution view it as a necessary step to rein in regulatory overreach by the Department of Health and Human Services, emphasizing the need for government accountability and adherence to procedural standards. However, critics may argue that such disapproval can undermine important regulations designed to protect public health and welfare, indicating a divide in how regulation is viewed within legislative discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SJR82 arise from the implications of disapproving the Department of Health and Human Services' rule, which may be seen as a broader agenda to limit executive authority in the regulatory sphere. While proponents argue that this resolution is essential to uphold legislative oversight, opponents may express concerns regarding its potential effects on the implementation of health policies and regulations that rely on the established rule. This highlights an ongoing debate within Congress on balancing regulatory control and the necessary checks on executive power, particularly concerning health-related legislation.