US Federal House Bill HR932

US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/4/25
• Refer: 12/4/25

Caption

Denouncing dangerous and seditious rhetoric by Members of Congress and expressing condemnation of Senator Mark Kelly, Senator Elissa Slotkin, Representative Jason Crow, Representative Christopher Deluzio, Representative Maggie Goodlander, and Representative Chrissy Houlahan for attempting to sow disallegiance amongst members of the United States military and intelligence community and encouraging them to act against the Commander in Chief and President of the United States and violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

Impact

The bill aims to reaffirm the constitutional authority of the President as Commander in Chief and to stress the legal obligation of military personnel to obey lawful orders. This reflects deeper concerns regarding potential insubordination that might arise from the public statements made by the Members of Congress mentioned in the bill. The resolution reinforces the importance of maintaining respect for the military and ensuring that public discussions do not erode trust between the military and the broader community.

Summary

HR932 is a resolution denouncing what is characterized as dangerous and seditious rhetoric by several Members of Congress, specifically targeting Senators and Representatives who allegedly suggested that members of the United States military and intelligence community should disregard 'illegal' orders from the President. The resolution condemns these members for undermining the chain of command which is fundamental for the effective operation of the Armed Forces in the United States. It highlights the serious implications of such rhetoric on national security and military cohesion.

Contention

Notably, the resolution raises significant issues about the political discourse surrounding the military and leadership in the United States. Opponents of the statements made by the Members of Congress argue that such claims can lead to serious public disillusionment with military orders and can compromise the morale and operational effectiveness of military personnel. Proponents of HR932 allege that encouraging dissent within the ranks can create a dangerous precedent, damaging the integrity of military duty and loyalty to lawful orders.