No Taxpayer Funding for the U.N. Population Fund ActThis bill prohibits the use of funds to provide contributions directly or indirectly to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The UNFPA is the United Nations sexual and reproductive health agency.
Impact
Should HB 699 be enacted into law, it would effectively eliminate any government funding to the UNFPA, an organization often criticized by conservative lawmakers for its alleged involvement in promoting abortion rights internationally. The bill would amend existing statutes to specifically prohibit the allocation of U.S. funds for these purposes, thereby tightening the control over how public money is spent on international aid. The move could greatly affect U.S. involvement in global health initiatives and reproductive rights advocacy, which may face significant setbacks without funding from one of the largest donor nations.
Summary
House Bill 699, titled the 'No Taxpayer Funding for the U.N. Population Fund Act', aims to prohibit any financial contributions from the United States to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Introduced in January 2025 by a group of Republican legislators, the bill reflects a long-standing controversy regarding U.S. support for international organizations that provide reproductive health services. The initiative seeks to ensure that U.S. taxpayer funds are not used to support programs that are connected to abortion services or population control policies, issues that remain contentious in American politics.
Contention
The potential passage of HB 699 has sparked debates among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters argue that taxpayer money should not fund organizations that may condone or promote policies contrary to U.S. values regarding life and family. They view the bill as a necessary step in maintaining ethical standards in foreign aid and protecting taxpayers from indirectly funding practices they oppose. Conversely, opponents assert that this bill undermines critical global health services that assist millions, particularly in developing countries, emphasizing that such measures could lead to increased maternal and infant mortality rates. They express concerns that by pulling funding, the U.S. would be withdrawing from its leadership role in promoting health and rights on an international scale.
To amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to ensure that businesses and organizations that work with vulnerable populations are able to request background checks for their contractors who work with those populations, as well as for individuals that the businesses or organizations license or certify to provide care for those populations.
End Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Providers ActThis bill prohibits federal funding for entities, or their affiliates, that perform abortions, provide referrals for abortions, or provide funding to others that perform abortions. It provides exceptions for abortions (1) in the case of rape or incest, or (2) when a physician certifies there is a danger of death to the woman without an abortion. The bill’s prohibition applies to any federal statutory law adopted after the bill’s effective date, unless such law contains an explicit exemption.
Defund National Endowment for the Humanities Act of 2025This bill prohibits the use of any funds that are made available to the National Endowment for the Humanities of the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities to carry out the functions, programs, or activities of such endowment.
Honoring the 108th anniversary of Selfridge Air National Guard Base and the contributions of Selfridge Air National Guard Base to the military and national security of the United States.
Stop Funding Global Terrorists Act of 2025This bill prohibits the United States from making any voluntary or assessed contributions to the United Nations (UN) for assistance to Afghanistan until the Department of State certifies to Congress that (1) no U.S. funds are used in cash shipments by the UN to Afghanistan, and (2) terrorist organizations do not receive funds as a result of such cash shipments. If the State Department later determines such a certification is inaccurate, it must revoke the certification and notify Congress.