US Federal 2025-2026 Regular Session

US Federal House Bill HB572

Introduced
1/21/25  

Caption

RED TAPE Act Regulations Evaluated to Determine The Anticipated Price and Effect Act

Impact

If passed, HB572 is set to amend Chapter 6 of Title 5 of the United States Code, explicitly prohibiting agencies from including non-monetized factors in their analyses. The potential implications are multifold, mainly emphasizing a stricter, more quantifiable approach to regulation. Advocates of the bill argue that this will streamline regulatory processes, ensuring compliance is more straightforward and that regulations only introduced will have a direct monetary benefit. However, the emphasis on quantifiability may overlook significant factors like environmental or social costs, which can be challenging to monetize.

Summary

House Bill 572, titled the 'RED TAPE Act', seeks to prohibit the consideration of non-monetized or unquantified factors in regulatory impact analyses and benefit-cost analyses for proposed government rules. The legislation mandates that all federal agencies prioritize tangible, measurable financial benefits in their decision-making processes, thereby aiming to enhance regulatory clarity and efficiency. This would require that governmental regulations yield obvious economic benefits to the public and private sectors, effectively minimizing unnecessary regulatory burdens or costs associated with compliance.

Contention

There are notable areas of contention surrounding the bill. Critics argue that the legislation could undermine the flexibility needed to assess critical qualitative factors that are crucial for comprehensive regulatory assessments, such as public health or environmental impacts. Additionally, the provision allowing for judicial review could lead to increased litigation against agencies, altering the regulatory landscape. Proponents maintain that these changes will help eliminate excessive bureaucracy and create a more conducive environment for businesses by ensuring only economically beneficial regulations are implemented.

Congress_id

119-HR-572

Policy_area

Government Operations and Politics

Introduced_date

2025-01-21

Companion Bills

US SB148

Related bill RED TAPE Act Regulations Evaluated to Determine The Anticipated Price and Effect Act

Previously Filed As

US SB148

RED TAPE Act Regulations Evaluated to Determine The Anticipated Price and Effect Act

US HB3743

Criminal procedure; competency determinations; examiners; evaluations; procedures to determine treatment; community-based outpatient programs; in patient care; progress reports; effective date.

US HB381

LNG Public Interest Determination Act of 2025

US SB1584

Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulations Act of 2025

US HB3147

Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulations Act

US SB76

Setting Manageable Analysis Requirements in Text Act of 2025 or the SMART Act of 2025This bill requires agencies, when publishing a proposed or final major rule, to include a framework for assessing whether the rule achieves its regulatory objective. An agency must assess a rule in the time frame included in the framework. The assessment must compare the rule's anticipated and actual benefits and costs.Additionally, the assessment must determine whether (1) the rule has been rendered unnecessary because of changes to the subject area affected by the rule or it overlaps with, duplicates, or conflicts with other rules, or state and local government regulations; (2) the rule should be expanded, streamlined, or otherwise modified to accomplish the rule's objective; and (3) other alternatives or modifications to the rule could better achieve the rule's objective. The bill defines a major rule as a rule likely to cause (1) an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; (2) a major increase in costs or prices; or (3) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, health, safety, the environment, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. 

US HB3757

Oklahoma Turnpike Authority; stating applicability; making determination of certain date of legislative authorization; effective date.

US SF626

A bill for an act relating to federal moneys and regulations, including the appropriation of federal moneys made available from federal block grants and other nonstate sources, the allocation of portions of federal block grants, the procedures if federal moneys or federal block grants are more or less than anticipated, and the authorization of certain city regulations when required under federal law, and including effective date and retroactive applicability provisions. (Formerly SSB 1216.) Effective date: 06/11/2025, 07/01/2025. Applicability date: 03/28/2025.

US SB1592

Insurance; allowing certain rates to be determined to be excessive in the Property and Casualty Competitive Loss Cost Rating Act. Effective date.

US HB1010

Election Law - Certification of Election-Supporting Technology - Regulations, Review, and Evaluation

Similar Bills

IA HF2090

A bill for an act providing for a regulatory relief program.

IA HF85

A bill for an act providing for a regulatory relief program.

RI H7383

Establishes a Regulatory Sandbox program designed to provide a depository for ideas in a regulatory approach.

RI H5717

Establishes a Regulatory Sandbox program designed to provide a depository for ideas in a regulatory approach.

OH HB176

Establish a universal regulatory sandbox program

KS HB2291

Creating the regulatory relief division within the office of the attorney general and establishing the general regulatory sandbox program to waive or suspend rules and regulations for program participants.

OH SB90

Create regulatory relief division; establish regulatory sandbox

AR HB1898

To Create The Regulatory Division And The Regulatory Enforcement Division In The Department Of Finance And Administration; And To Allow Personnel Of The Regulatory Enforcement Division To Be Designated As Agents.