Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1147

Filed
2/6/25  
Out of Senate Committee
3/27/25  
Voted on by Senate
4/8/25  
Out of House Committee
4/28/25  
Voted on by House
4/29/25  
Governor Action
5/13/25  

Caption

Relating to the withdrawal of the State of Texas from the Interstate Mining Compact.

Impact

The passage of SB1147 would lead to the abolition of both the Office of the Interstate Mining Compact Commissioner for Texas and the Texas Mining Council, marking a notable shift in how Texas regulates and engages with mining activities. Moreover, Chapter 132 of the Natural Resources Code is set to be repealed a year after the notice is published. This transition indicates a movement towards more independent regulation of mining in Texas, potentially altering the landscape of mining management and compliance for companies operating within the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 1147 is a legislative act proposing the withdrawal of the State of Texas from the Interstate Mining Compact, as dictated by Section 132.002 of the Texas Natural Resources Code. The bill explicitly mandates that the Governor of Texas provide written notice of this withdrawal to other member states and publish such notice in the Texas Register. This legislative move reflects a significant change in the state's approach to mining and resource governance, removing Texas from a collaborative regulatory framework established among a group of states via the Compact.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB1147 is yet to be fully gauged as the bill just recently passed through legislative processes with a notable majority, including a 30-0 vote in the Senate and a 139-7 vote in the House. Such overwhelming support indicates a generally favorable sentiment among legislators, suggesting a unified stance on the perceived benefits of state autonomy in managing mining operations as opposed to adhering to interstate agreements. However, opposition may arise from stakeholders who favor collaborative approaches and shared regulations across state lines.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise from the impacts of this withdrawal, given that the Interstate Mining Compact was designed to streamline regulation and resource management collaboratively among member states. Critics may express concerns regarding the potential decrease in regulatory oversight and shared best practices. Stakeholders within the mining industry and environmental advocacy groups might question whether Texas can effectively manage its resources independently without the benefits of the Compact's cooperative framework, which could lead to disparities in environmental protections and resource management practices.

Companion Bills

TX HB3506

Identical Relating to the withdrawal of the State of Texas from the Interstate Mining Compact.

Previously Filed As

TX HB3506

Relating to the withdrawal of the State of Texas from the Interstate Mining Compact.

TX SB464

Enacts the Interstate Mining Compact. (BDR 46-1125)

TX HB05158

An Act Withdrawing Connecticut From The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.

TX SB00326

An Act Withdrawing Connecticut From The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.

TX SB054

Mining Reclamation & Interstate Compact

TX SB1834

Relating to the adoption of the revised Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children by the State of Texas; making conforming changes.

TX HB141

Relating to the adoption of the revised Interstate Compact for the Placement of Children by the State of Texas; making conforming changes.

TX HB36

AN ACT relating to interstate licensure compacts.

TX SB37

Interstate compact, massage therapy

TX HB2557

Enacting and joining with other states in the interstate compact for the placement of children and authorizing the administration and implementation of the compact.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.