Tennessee Senate Bill SB2028

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/26
• Engrossed: 3/12/26
• Enrolled: 3/24/26
• Passed: 4/7/26
• Chaptered: 4/13/26

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 39-17-1314; Section 70-1-206 and Section 70-4-107, relative to the authority of the Tennessee fish and wildlife commission to proscribe the manner and means of taking wildlife.

Impact

The impact of SB2028 is significant, as it seeks to centralize hunting regulations under the authority of the Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission. The bill aims to streamline compliance for hunters by providing clear guidelines that are consistent across the state. Additionally, it underscores the notion that wildlife management is a matter of statewide concern requiring oversight that prevents local entities from enacting laws that could differ from or contradict state statutes. Local governments are still allowed to enforce general criminal laws, but must not interfere with state-sanctioned hunting practices.

Summary

Senate Bill 2028 aims to clarify and reaffirm the authority of the Tennessee Fish and Wildlife Commission in regulating hunting practices. The bill modifies existing state law to ensure that local governments cannot create their own regulations regarding the manner and means of taking wildlife, which includes the discharge of firearms during lawful hunting activities. By establishing that state regulations take precedence, the bill addresses concerns about conflicting local regulations that may confuse hunters and undermine statewide efforts for uniform wildlife management.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB2028 appears to be supportive among members of the legislature who advocate for the efficiency and consistency of statewide regulations. Proponents argue that it is essential for ensuring that all hunters in Tennessee adhere to the same rules, promoting safety and accountability. However, some concerns may exist regarding the reduction of local governmental authority, as critics argue that local conditions and needs could be overlooked, potentially putting certain areas at a disadvantage when it comes to wildlife management.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB2028 could arise from the implications it has on local governance. While proponents laud the clarity and uniformity it brings to hunting regulations, opponents may contend that it undermines local decision-making capacities that are vital for addressing community-specific issues related to wildlife conservation and public safety. Furthermore, the limited scope for local regulation, particularly the prohibition on regulating in proximity to schools, may raise questions for those in areas where local contexts significantly affect hunting practices.