Tennessee Senate Bill SB1851

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/26

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 16; Title 36; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 49 and Title 65, relative to firearms.

Impact

If enacted, SB1851 would impact existing state laws significantly by clarifying the repercussions for individuals who violate stipulations surrounding firearm possession. Specifically, it establishes clear parameters indicating that individuals with felony crimes of violence, felony drug offenses, and certain domestic violence misdemeanors will face increased penalties should they attempt to possess firearms. The changes would both define offenses more clearly and provide a structured penalty framework, addressing concerns about gun possession by individuals deemed dangerous due to their past actions.

Summary

SB1851 is a legislative proposal aimed at amending various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning firearm possession and related offenses. The bill primarily focuses on individuals who are prohibited from possessing firearms due to felony and domestic violence convictions, as well as those adjudicated with mental health issues. The proposed legislation seeks to redefine the criteria under which persons may or may not possess firearms, outlining specific offenses and the associated penalties, which range from misdemeanors to felonies based on the nature of the underlying conviction.

Contention

The bill has sparked considerable debate among legislators, with proponents arguing that tightening restrictions on firearm possession for individuals with specific criminal backgrounds is crucial for public safety. They believe SB1851 will prevent firearms from falling into the hands of those who may present a risk to the community. However, opponents argue that the proposed amendments may punish individuals who have served their time or have had their civil rights restored, voicing concerns about the potential overreach in the state's control over firearm regulations. This contention reflects a broader national conversation about gun rights and public safety.