AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 36 and Title 37, relative to children.
Impact
One of the most impactful elements of SB 943 is the introduction of a rebuttable presumption that parents who have restricted or supervised visitation will bear the costs associated with such visitation. This significant shift places financial responsibility primarily on the offending parent, which is intended to protect the non-offending parent from incurring additional costs. Moreover, this bill modifies how courts document their findings in custody orders, necessitating detailed written findings that justify decisions regarding visitation and custody arrangements.
Summary
Senate Bill 943 proposes significant amendments to Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically in Title 36 and Title 37 concerning children and custody issues. The bill introduces new provisions related to the determinations of child custody and visitation, focusing on cases where a parent has been found to have restricted parenting time due to specific findings, such as abuse or failure to meet court-ordered child support obligations. These amendments are aimed at reinforcing the criteria that courts must use when making custody decisions, ensuring that they consider all relevant factors in a child's welfare and safeguarding the child's best interests.
Sentiment
The sentiment around SB 943 appears to be mixed but leans toward support due to its focus on the welfare of children and clear documentation by courts in custody matters. Proponents argue that the bill enhances the accountability of parents with a history of problematic behavior, thus prioritizing child safety. However, there are concerns among some circles about the potential financial burden that the presumption of cost on the offending parent may impose, particularly if their financial circumstances are precarious.
Contention
Notable points of contention include the definitions and implications of 'abuse,' which now extend to actions indirectly inflicted by others at the behest of the offending parent. This broader definition could lead to disputes over what constitutes abuse in custody cases. Additionally, while supporters believe that financial responsibility should rest with the offending parent, critics warn that it might discourage parents from seeking help in abusive situations for fear of imposing financial liabilities.
Practice of medicine; creating the Supervised Physicians Act; limiting scope of supervised practice; directing specified Boards to promulgate certain rules; requiring collaborative practice arrangements; creating certain exemptions; effective date.
Practice of medicine; creating the Supervised Physicians Act; limiting scope of supervised practice; directing specified Boards to promulgate certain rules; requiring collaborative practice arrangements; creating certain exemptions; effective date.
Practice of nursing; modifying restriction on supervision fees for Advanced Practice Registered Nurses; prohibiting certain requirements by the Oklahoma Board of Nursing. Effective date.