Tennessee Senate Bill SB0033

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/6/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, Chapter 13, relative to the offense of reckless endangerment.

Impact

The enactment of 'MaKayla's Law' represents a proactive step towards bolstering public safety in Tennessee by addressing the critical issue of firearm access among minors. By imposing legal consequences for negligence in securing firearms, the bill encourages gun owners to take responsible measures to ensure their weapons are inaccessible to children. The law is expected to contribute to a potential decrease in gun-related accidents and fatalities among younger populations, aligning with broader efforts to promote firearm safety.

Summary

Senate Bill 33, also known as 'MaKayla's Law', amends the Tennessee Code to introduce strict penalties for the reckless endangerment of children through improper storage of firearms. The bill specifically targets situations where a child under the age of thirteen acquires access to a firearm that has not been securely locked or stored. If a child discharges the firearm resulting in bodily harm, the bill classifies this offense as a Class E felony. If the discharge results in death, it elevates the charge to a Class C felony. This legislative change aims to enhance the safety of children and prevent tragic accidents involving firearms.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB0033 is predominantly positive, particularly among child advocacy groups and public safety organizations. Proponents endorse the bill as a necessary measure to protect children and reduce firearm accidents. Conversely, there may exist some opposition from groups concerned about potential implications for gun owners' rights and the practicality of enforcing secure storage regulations. Nevertheless, the urgency of preventing tragic incidents involving children and firearms has generated strong support for this legislation.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding SB0033 include the potential for overreach in government regulation of firearm ownership and the responsibilities placed on gun owners. While advocates argue that the measure is essential for child safety, opponents may express concerns about how the law might be perceived as infringing on individual rights. Additionally, discussions may arise regarding the definition of 'secure storage' and the enforcement of this requirement, which could lead to debates about the effectiveness and fairness of the law.