Tennessee House Bill HJR0091

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/3/25
• Refer: 2/5/25
• Refer: 2/25/25
• Refer: 3/25/25
• Engrossed: 4/1/25
• Enrolled: 2/25/26
• Passed: 3/3/26

Caption

A RESOLUTION expressing support for the Crisis Recovery Network coordinated by the Southern Regional Education Board and the participation of the State of Tennessee, recognizing the Network as a trusted support for Tennessee schools, districts, and postsecondary institutions to call upon if the need arises.

Impact

HJR0091 seeks to formalize a commitment to bolstering mental health services in the aftermath of traumatic events, addressing the existing gaps in support that schools struggle with during recovery phases. The resolution implies that, with the support of the SREB, Tennessee schools, districts, and postsecondary institutions will have access to specialized counselors who can provide appropriate psychological first aid and counseling tailored to an educational environment. This could significantly improve the recovery processes for affected communities, supporting not only students but also staff who may also be coping with the emotional aftermath of crises.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 91 (HJR0091) expresses support for the Crisis Recovery Network coordinated by the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB) and acknowledges the importance of the State of Tennessee's participation in this initiative. The resolution highlights the need for sustained support after crises such as natural disasters and school shootings, emphasizing that recovery is an extended healing process necessitating considerable resources and professional guidance. This recognition comes in light of the challenges faced by local educational institutions, particularly rural districts, which often have limited access to counselors and mental health resources.

Contention

While there is a broad consensus on the necessity for mental health support systems, potential points of contention may emerge regarding the allocation of state resources and the effectiveness of external counselors compared to traditional school-based support systems. Critics may question the sustainability of this initiative or its impact on existing educational frameworks, especially in light of budget constraints. Nonetheless, supporters advocate strongly for this monthly and long-term approach, highlighting successful recovery models and stressing the importance of collaboration among educational authorities and mental health professionals.