Tennessee House Bill HB2193

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/2/26
• Refer: 2/5/26

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 71, relative to welfare.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB2193 would fundamentally shift the power dynamics related to welfare benefits in Tennessee. By stipulating that the governor cannot unilaterally decide to disenroll or not enroll the state in the Summer EBT program without legislative approval, the bill provides a check on executive power. This amendment is particularly pertinent given recent legislative actions where substantial sums, such as $84 million, were declined under the previous administration. Advocates for the bill argue that a more democratic process for such decisions is crucial for serving vulnerable populations.

Summary

House Bill 2193 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated specifically concerning welfare provisions. The bill seeks to ensure that the decision-making authority regarding the state's enrollment in the Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) program, known as SUN Bucks, is removed from the governor. Instead, this decision would require a joint resolution from the General Assembly, thus fostering a more collective legislative approach to welfare enrollment decisions. This is significant in light of prior decisions where the governor opted out of substantial federal funding for the program.

Sentiment

General sentiment towards HB2193 appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents who see it as a necessary step for enhancing accountability and transparency in welfare decisions. Advocates argue that involving the General Assembly directly in welfare benefit decisions can lead to better outcomes for the needy. However, there may also be concerns regarding potential delays in decision-making and the overall efficacy of legislative processes, especially in urgent welfare scenarios.

Contention

Key points of contention regarding HB2193 may revolve around the balance of power between the legislature and the governor's office. Opponents of the bill might express concerns that requiring legislative approval for EBT program decisions could hinder timely responses to welfare needs, particularly in financially volatile situations. Supporters, however, emphasize that it promotes checks and balances and prevents unilateral decision-making that could adversely impact thousands of reliant families.