Tennessee House Bill HB2010

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/26
• Refer: 2/4/26
• Failed: 3/18/26

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 9 and Title 12, relative to procurement of tires.

Impact

The implications of this bill on state laws are significant, as it introduces new compliance responsibilities for tire manufacturers and suppliers engaged in state procurement. By enforcing a requirement for explicit disclosure regarding manufacturing processes, the bill seeks to standardize information provided to state agencies, fostering compliance and accountability in the procurement of goods. Non-compliance could lead to penalties, including the suspension or termination of contracts, thereby emphasizing the bill's intention to ensure adherence to the new guidelines.

Summary

House Bill 2010 amends the Tennessee Code to establish specific requirements for the procurement of tires with a focus on the manufacturing process, particularly the use of one hundred percent (100%) French process zinc oxide. The bill mandates that vendors supplying tires to the state must clearly identify which tires are made using this specified process in their submissions for bids, price lists, or buying guides. This requirement is aimed at enhancing transparency in the procurement process and ensuring that state agencies are informed about the materials used in the products they procure.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 2010 appears supportive among legislators interested in procurement reforms and product transparency. Advocates argue that it enhances the state's ability to ensure that products meet specific safety and quality standards. However, there might be some concerns from suppliers about the potential administrative burden that comes with compliance and the risk of penalties for non-compliance, which could create a contentious dialogue during discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the interpretative aspects of the requirements imposed by the bill. Some stakeholders might question the feasibility of identifying products exclusively manufactured with the specified zinc oxide process, especially regarding existing contracts and how manufacturers can enforce compliance with these new standards. Additionally, the bill's impact on the competitive landscape for suppliers who use different manufacturing processes could feed into broader discussions on procurement fairness and equity among tire suppliers.