Tennessee House Bill HB1746

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/26
• Refer: 1/22/26

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 47, Chapter 18 and Title 53, relative to foods that contain forever chemicals.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1746 would establish specific regulations concerning food safety and consumer protection in Tennessee. By requiring labeling of products containing forever chemicals, the bill aims to enhance transparency and allow consumers to make informed choices regarding their food purchases. The implementation of this legislation would likely lead to increased scrutiny of food production practices and supply chains, compelling manufacturers and retailers to assess and potentially modify their offerings. As a result, public health could improve as consumers become more conscious of the chemicals in their food.

Summary

House Bill 1746 seeks to address public health concerns regarding the presence of 'forever chemicals' in food products. Specifically, the bill amends Tennessee Code Annotated by introducing requirements for food that contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The legislation mandates that any food product sold within the state that contains these substances must be clearly labeled, informing consumers not only that the food contains forever chemicals but also disclosing any known or potential health effects associated with these chemicals. This bill recognizes the growing awareness of the dangers posed by such synthetic compounds that persist in the environment and human bodies.

Contention

There are potential points of contention surrounding HB 1746, particularly regarding the implications for businesses involved in food production and sale. Opponents may argue that the labeling requirements could place undue burden on food producers, particularly smaller companies with limited resources. Additionally, there may be debates regarding the scientific evidence required to determine health effects and how strictly those requirements should be enforced. Supporters argue that the bill is vital for protecting consumers and public health, while critics may stress the economic impacts and operational challenges posed by additional regulations.