Tennessee House Bill HB1401

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/25
• Refer: 2/10/25
• Refer: 1/14/26

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3; Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8; Title 9; Title 10; Title 11; Title 12; Title 13; Title 16; Title 17; Title 18; Title 29; Title 33; Title 36; Title 37; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 41; Title 42; Title 43; Title 44; Title 45; Title 47; Title 48; Title 49; Title 50; Title 53; Title 54; Title 55; Title 56; Title 57; Title 58; Title 59; Title 60; Title 61; Title 62; Title 63; Title 64; Title 65; Title 66; Title 67; Title 68; Title 69; Title 70 and Title 71, relative to statutory revisions required for implementation of the annual appropriations act.

Impact

The proposed amendments aim to clarify the administration of grant payments within the state, ensuring that these payments are nonassignable. The bill stipulates that grants must be paid only to the intended individuals or their legally authorized representatives, explicitly stating that nursing homes cannot act in this capacity. This change is significant as it sets a clear directive on the distribution and management of grant payments, which may affect various federally or state-funded assistance programs.

Summary

House Bill 1401 is a legislative proposal in Tennessee that seeks to amend multiple titles within the Tennessee Code Annotated. The core focus of the bill is to implement statutory revisions required for the execution of the annual appropriations act. This bill outlines specific changes related to how grant payments are administered, indicating that they must be paid directly to individuals on either a monthly or quarterly basis at their respective residences.

Contention

While the text of HB1401 does not outline any visible points of contention, the implications of restricting grant payments to individuals and their representatives might lead to discussions around the efficacy and accessibility of assistance programs in Tennessee. Stakeholders may express differing opinions on whether these revisions enhance the security and proper allocation of funds or whether they inadvertently complicate the process for individuals who depend on such grant assistance.