Tennessee House Bill HB0495

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/25
• Refer: 2/5/25
• Refer: 3/19/25
• Refer: 3/25/25
• Engrossed: 4/1/25
• Enrolled: 4/16/25
• Passed: 5/2/25
• Chaptered: 5/8/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63 and Title 68, relative to medical records.

Impact

The passage of HB 0495 is poised to significantly impact the landscape of healthcare regulations within Tennessee. The new fee caps and requirements increase transparency and affordability for patients seeking access to their medical records, addressing concerns about prohibitive costs that have historically deterred individuals from obtaining their records. By standardizing these regulations, the bill is anticipated to lower the barriers for patients who wish to engage in their health management and understand their healthcare histories more clearly, potentially leading to better health outcomes overall.

Summary

House Bill 0495 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Titles 63 and 68, concerning the regulation and fees associated with medical records. This legislation revises the cost structure for copying and sending medical records, establishing new fee caps that apply to both electronic and paper formats. For instance, it sets a flat fee of $90 for all electronic records, while limiting charges for paper records to $25 for the first five pages and $0.50 for each additional page. The bill also outlines provisions regarding certifying and notarizing records, aiming to ensure reasonable access to patient information without imposing excessive financial burdens on individuals making requests.

Sentiment

Reactions to House Bill 0495 have generally been positive, particularly among patient advocacy groups who see the changes as a victory for consumer rights and access to healthcare. Supporters argue that the bill promotes patient autonomy by allowing individuals easier access to their medical information. However, some healthcare providers and institutions have raised concerns about the feasibility of implementing these changes, particularly regarding the administrative burden and cost implications of adapting to the new fee structures.

Contention

Although the bill has received considerable support, there are notable points of contention regarding the implementation of the new fees and processes. Providers have expressed worries that the limits on fees may not sufficiently cover the operational costs associated with maintaining and providing access to medical records. This could potentially lead to complications for medical facilities who may struggle to comply without incurring losses. The debate surrounding HB 0495 highlights the tension between ensuring patient access to information and managing the financial realities of healthcare provision.