Tennessee House Bill HB0387

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/27/25
• Refer: 2/5/25
• Refer: 3/19/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 63 and Title 68, relative to healthcare providers.

Impact

The impact of HB 0387 extends to healthcare regulations and the interactions between medical personnel and their patients. By preventing inquiries about firearm ownership, the legislation aims to protect the constitutional rights of individuals in Tennessee concerning firearms while undergoing medical care. It emphasizes that patient treatment cannot be predicated on a patient's firearm status, potentially influencing both patient trust and provider practices across the healthcare system in the state.

Summary

House Bill 0387 seeks to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated concerning healthcare providers' interactions with patients regarding firearm ownership. The bill specifically prohibits healthcare providers from inquiring about a patient's ownership or access to firearms, ammunition, or related accessories. It establishes that such inquiries cannot influence the provision of medical treatment, ensuring that a patient's rights to own firearms are not discriminated against in healthcare contexts. Healthcare providers found to breach this law may face disciplinary action and fines.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 0387 appears to be divisive. Supporters argue that the bill safeguards individual rights and reinforces the non-intrusive role of healthcare providers concerning personal matters like firearm ownership. Conversely, critics raise concerns about the implications of such a bill, suggesting that it could hinder important patient-provider dialogues about safety and risk management associated with firearm use, particularly in contexts involving mental health and children.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 0387 hinge on the rights of patients versus the responsibilities of healthcare providers. Opponents of the bill may assert that restricting inquiries about firearms could diminish the quality of care, especially in cases where knowledge of patient firearm access is relevant to treatment or safety. Conversely, supporters view the bill as essential in preventing discrimination and protecting personal rights against perceived encroachment by healthcare systems.