Tennessee House Bill HB0314

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/25
• Refer: 2/3/25
• Refer: 4/1/25
• Refer: 4/9/25
• Chaptered: 5/13/25
• Passed: 5/13/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 29-13-106, relative to criminal injuries compensation.

Impact

The bill introduces a mechanism for the state treasurer to adjust the maximum award annually based on national averages, effectively allowing for continuous updates to compensation rates without requiring legislative action every time. If the maximum award were to decrease, specific approval from legislative leaders would be obligatory before publication, which aims to prevent unapproved reductions that could adversely affect victims' support. These adjustments are set to be effective for claims filed for crimes occurring on or after July 1, 2025.

Summary

House Bill 0314 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Section 29-13-106, to enhance the state’s criminal injuries compensation program. The bill seeks to update the maximum compensation award limit to be equal to 105% of the national average of such compensation awards across the states and territories. This adjustment is intended to align Tennessee's compensation awards with national standards, ensuring that victims of crime receive financial assistance commensurate with comparable jurisdictions.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 0314 appears to be generally positive, as it provides a structured and fair approach to compensating victims of crime, resonating well with advocacy groups focused on victim rights. The intent to enhance benefits for victims is likely to garner support from legislators who prioritize public welfare and victim assistance. However, discussions may also highlight concerns regarding the administrative aspects of implementing these adjustments and whether they accurately reflect the best interests of victims.

Contention

While there is broad support for the enhancement of victims' compensation, potential contention may arise in the administrative processes involved in regularly comparing and adjusting award limits. Some legislators may express concerns about the potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies or miscalculations in comparing with other states. Furthermore, the bill's approach to require legislative approval for reducing awards could spark debates about the balance between executive control and legislative oversight in the administration of the compensation program.