South Dakota Senate Bill SB9

South Dakota 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/13/26
• Refer: 1/13/26
• Report Pass: 1/20/26
• Engrossed: 1/22/26
• Refer: 1/23/26
• Report Pass: 2/2/26
• Enrolled: 2/3/26
• Passed: 2/12/26

Caption

Revise provisions regarding notices to the one-call notification center.

Impact

The bill modifies existing state laws to clarify responsibilities related to excavation activities. Specifically, it outlines the process for operators to mark underground facilities after being notified and establishes rules for response times. These changes are intended to streamline the communication process between excavators and operators, thereby reducing potential delays while maintaining safety protocols. The bill emphasizes the importance of proper notification to prevent risks associated with unmarked underground utilities.

Summary

Senate Bill 9 aims to revise the provisions related to notices that must be given to the one-call notification center prior to any excavation activities. The bill stipulates that excavators are required to notify the one-call notification center at least forty-eight hours before commencing any excavation. This timeframe is designed to ensure proper assessment and marking of underground facilities that may be affected by such activities, thus enhancing safety and reducing the risk of accidental damage.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB9 appears generally supportive among industry stakeholders who emphasize the need for clear communication and safety in excavation practices. Advocates argue that the revisions made by the bill will help prevent accidents and improve efficiency in excavation processes. However, there may be some concerns regarding the implementation of these requirements and whether they are stringent enough to ensure complete safety.

Contention

Notable points of contention around SB9 may revolve around the adequacy of the specified notification period and whether additional safety measures should be mandated. Critics may argue for a longer notification timeframe for more complex excavation projects, while proponents would likely assert that the current stipulations provide sufficient time to identify and mark underground facilities. The bill's potential impact on operators’ liability during excavation activities could also be a point of debate.