Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring a declaration of necessity and clarifying public use of private property taken or damaged by eminent domain.
Impact
If passed, HJR5001 will significantly impact state laws related to eminent domain, emphasizing the necessity of clear declarations and just compensation for property owners affected by governmental takings. The amendment explicitly excludes certain benefits, such as increased tax revenues or economic growth, from being considered in compensation calculations. This could affect how future eminent domain cases are handled, potentially making it more difficult for government and private corporations to justify taking private property under the pretense of public use.
Summary
HJR5001, introduced by Representative Gosch, is a proposed joint resolution that seeks to amend the South Dakota Constitution regarding the use of eminent domain. The amendment requires a public declaration of necessity whenever private property is taken or damaged for public use. This enhances property rights by mandating that just compensation be determined through established legal procedures, ensuring owners are not deprived of their property without proper justification. The resolution aims to protect property owners from potential overreach by the government or private entities when invoking eminent domain.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HJR5001 appears largely supportive among property rights advocates who argue that the resolution fortifies protections for individuals. Discussions indicate a positive outlook from those concerned about governmental authority and its potential impacts on private property. However, it may also generate contention among government officials and developers who argue that such restrictions could hinder necessary infrastructure and economic development projects.
Contention
One notable point of contention is the resolution's definition of 'public use,' which excludes economic growth from its consideration. Opponents may argue this overly restricts the government's ability to promote infrastructure projects beneficial to the community at large. Additionally, the resolution could lead to legal challenges as property owners and governments navigate the new requirements, adding complexity to future eminent domain actions within the state.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, clarifying that an individual must be a citizen of the United States to be eligible to vote.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, limiting to a flat rate the real property taxes.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, limiting the assessed value of real property and limiting real property taxes.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, establishing the trust for unclaimed property fund.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, providing for wagering on sporting events via mobile or electronic platform.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring that a constitutional amendment receive an affirmative vote of sixty percent of the votes cast before the measure is enacted.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring a number of signatures on a petition to initiate a constitutional amendment be obtained from each county.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election amendments to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring an intervening general election before consideration of an initiated constitutional amendment or initiated measure having the same subject as a previously rejected initiated amendment or measure.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election amendments to the Constitution to the State of South Dakota, increasing the number of required signatures on a petition to initiate an amendment or measure.
Proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, conditioning the requirement of expanded Medicaid on the level of federal medical assistance.