South Dakota 2026 Regular Session

South Dakota House Bill HB1144

Caption

Restrict the use of artificial intelligence in therapy and psychotherapy services and to provide a penalty therefor.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1144 will significantly impact state laws regarding mental health services, as it ensures that any use of AI in therapy must be closely monitored and cannot replace human therapists' roles. Licensed professionals are allowed to use AI strictly for administrative tasks, such as scheduling and billing, rather than engaging in direct therapeutic interactions. This measure is intended to protect clients from the dangers associated with AI misjudgment in emotional or behavioral health assessments, thereby fostering a secure therapeutic environment. Furthermore, any infractions related to the unauthorized use of AI can lead to civil penalties up to $10,000, which will serve as a deterrent to potential violations.

Summary

House Bill 1144 introduces a regulatory framework for the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in therapy and psychotherapy services within South Dakota. The bill aims to restrict the application of AI, particularly in aspects such as therapeutic decision-making and communications, thereby safeguarding against potential misapplications of technology in sensitive mental health contexts. It outlines the definitions of key terms related to AI and sets clear boundaries regarding its permitted uses by licensed professionals, ensuring human oversight and judgment remain central to therapeutic practices.

Contention

Controversy around HB 1144 may arise from differing opinions on the role of technology in mental health care. While proponents argue that this bill provides essential consumer protections, opponents may view it as overly restrictive and potentially hindering access to innovative therapeutic tools and solutions. The debate is likely to center on balancing technological advancement with appropriate safeguards, particularly as the mental health field increasingly explores AI's potential to enhance service delivery. The bill also emphasizes that consent for AI usage must be explicitly obtained, raising discussions about clients' awareness and control over their mental health treatment processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

SD HB1247

Modify massage therapist licensure requirements and to create a penalty therefor.

SD HB1166

Enhance penalties for the violation of right-to-work statutes and to provide a penalty therefor.

SD HB1069

Regulate vapor products and to provide a penalty therefor.

SD HB1056

Prohibit the preparation, sale, and distribution of certain kratom products and to provide a penalty therefor.

SD SB164

Prohibit the use of a deepfake to influence an election and to provide a penalty therefor.

SD HB1267

Prohibit the use of paid petition circulators, and provide a penalty therefor.

SD SB130

Authorize the shipment of distilled spirits direct to consumers, and to provide a penalty therefor.

SD HB1009

Provide for the creation and use of South Dakota educational empowerment accounts, and to provide a penalty therefor.

SD HB1090

Establish the crime of hazing and to provide a penalty therefor.

SD SB209

Modify aircraft registration fees and to provide a penalty therefor.

Similar Bills

CA AB586

Professional fiduciaries.

AZ SB1656

Family court; professional personnel; requirements

CA AB1796

Licensed Professional Interior Designer Practice Act.

TN SB2399

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 33; Title 36; Title 49; Title 52; Title 56; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to professional counselors.

TN HB1917

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 33; Title 36; Title 49; Title 52; Title 56; Title 63 and Title 68, relative to professional counselors.

MI HB4728

Occupations: individual licensing and registration; licensure of professional guardians and conservators; require. Amends sec. 303a of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.303a) & adds art. 14A.

FL S0888

Professional Services Contracts

AZ SB1147

Family court; post decree; experts