South Dakota 2025 Regular Session

South Dakota Senate Bill SB173

Introduced
1/30/25  
Refer
2/3/25  
Report Pass
2/7/25  
Engrossed
2/10/25  
Refer
2/11/25  
Report Pass
3/5/25  
Enrolled
3/6/25  

Caption

Revise the process by which a recount may be requested.

Impact

If enacted, SB173 clarifies and revises the regulations surrounding recount requests, which may lead to increased accountability and transparency in elections. By standardizing the recount process, the bill aims to ensure that candidates can swiftly contest results they believe to be erroneous. This change is expected to foster confidence in electoral processes, particularly in close races, by providing a clear mechanism for recounts. However, it also implies that recounts must be thoroughly coordinated and conducted efficiently to meet the new requirements.

Summary

Senate Bill 173 aims to amend the existing laws regarding the process by which candidates can request a recount in South Dakota elections. The bill specifies that candidates who lose an election by a narrow margin must file a petition to initiate a recount within a designated timeframe after the official canvass. Particularly, for legislative districts comprising more than one county, a candidate defeated by a margin of no more than two percent can request a recount, while candidates for other offices can do so if the margin is one-fourth of one percent. Similar provisions apply to referendums voted on by the public.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB173 is somewhat favorable among those advocating for electoral integrity. Supporters argue that establishing a clear recount process is crucial for upholding democratic values and ensuring that every vote is counted accurately. Conversely, some skepticism may exist regarding the resources and time required to implement these recounts, particularly in densely populated areas where election results are closely contested.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the feasibility of conducting recounts within the newly specified timeframes, especially for races involving multiple counties. Critics might express concern over the administrative burden this places on election officials, potentially leading to logistical challenges. Additionally, the requirement for a certain number of registered voters to petition for a recount in statewide questions could raise issues about accessibility and the effective representation of voter interests.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB493

An act to amend Section 4508 of the Food and Agricultural Code, relating to fairs.

LA HB1037

Modifies operations and certain positions within the Department of Transportation and Development (EN NO IMPACT See Note)

LA HB528

Reforms the organizational structure for the Department of Transportation and Development including its duties, powers, and responsibilities of officers and employees (EN INCREASE SD EX See Note)

AR SB63

To Amend Arkansas Law Concerning Reports By The Secretaries Of Cabinet-level Departments On The State Of Their Departments.

CA AB655

An act to amend Section 99522 of the Government Code, relating to state government.

IA HSB665

A bill for an act providing for certain business entities acting under the jurisdiction of the secretary of state by providing for the removal of information from a filing based on a sworn affidavit and administrative dissolution based on the response to interrogatories.(See HF 2678.)