South Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

South Carolina House Bill H5140

Introduced
2/10/26  
Refer
2/10/26  
Engrossed
2/25/26  

Caption

Regulation of Notarial Fees

Impact

The increase in notarial fees could have diverse implications for both notaries and consumers. Proponents argue that this change reflects the rising costs of services and inflation, thus allowing notaries to sustain their business operation costs effectively. On the other hand, there are concerns regarding the accessibility of notarial services for individuals who may find the higher costs burdensome. This change could lead to discussions about balancing fair compensation for notaries with the need to keep services affordable for the public.

Summary

House Bill 5140 aims to amend the South Carolina Code of Laws specifically by modifying Section 26-1-100 regarding notarial fees. The primary purpose of this bill is to increase the maximum fees that notaries can charge for various notarial acts. Currently, the maximum fee is set at five dollars for multiple services, including acknowledgments, oaths, and jurats. The proposed amendment seeks to raise this fee limit to ten dollars per act, potentially impacting the cost structure for those requiring notarial services.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 5140 appears to be cautiously optimistic among supporters who view it as a necessary adjustment to align with inflationary trends. However, there are also voices of opposition concerned about adverse effects on individuals, particularly in low-income demographics who might struggle with the increased fees. The discourse is likely to reflect broader trial on social equity in access to essential services such as notarization.

Contention

Key points of contention include the differing perspectives on whether the fee adjustments are warranted in light of economic changes. Opponents may argue that raising fees could erect barriers to accessing important legal and administrative services. Conversely, supporters contend that the adjustment is essential for sustaining the viability of notarial practices. This debate could reveal underlying tensions about how fees for public services are set and who ultimately bears the cost of such changes.

Companion Bills

SC H3190

Similar To Notary fees

Previously Filed As

SC HB1154

Mississippi Law on Notarial Acts; revise to allow notaries to perform remote online notarization.

SC HB289

Courts; remote online notaries public and remote online notarizations; provide

SC HB189

Notaries public; limitations regarding certain notarial acts; provide

SC SB2456

Remote online notarization; allow.

SC S09775

Limits recordkeeping and reporting duties of public notaries to electronic notarization acts.

SC SB00262

An Act Concerning The Fees Charged By A Notary For The Performance Of A Notarial Act.

SC SB90

Notaries Public; the modernization of certain legal, notarial, and court services using electronic means; provide

SC HB1437

Notaries public; notarial acts to be performed using electronic means when certain requirements are satisfied; provide

SC H3190

Notary fees

SC HB5658

Occupations: notaries public; use of communication technology to perform electronic notarizations and remote electronic notarizations; modify and expand. Amends secs. 3, 5, 26, 26a, 26b, & 27 of 2003 PA 238 (MCL 55.263 et seq.); adds sec. 26e & repeals sec. 26d of 2003 PA 238 (MCL 55.286d).

Similar Bills

CA AB827

Voting: signature verification.

AZ HB2845

Candidate petitions; random sample verification

CA SB3

Elections: signature verification and results.

CA SB321

Late signature curing expenditure reports.

MT SB226

Require petition submittals be dropped off within a specific timeframe

CA AB25

An act to amend Sections 3000.

CA AB459

Initiatives: qualification: electronic signatures.

CA SB902

Childcare: electronic signatures.