Creates an intervenor compensation program to provide compensation in the form of grants for legal fees, expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs to an intervenor in both, energy siting board and public utilities commission proceedings.
Impact
The bill's impact on state laws revolves around the establishment of a special fund to finance these grants, which is anticipated to be funded through annual appropriations from the general assembly. Each grant will be capped at fifty thousand dollars, adjustable biennially according to the consumer price index. This financial backing is critical for individuals or organizations who would otherwise be unable to absorb the costs associated with legal representation and expert consultations, thus fostering greater community involvement in utility regulation discussions and decisions. The inclusion of stipulations ensuring transparency and accountability for the use of granted funds further bolsters the integrity of the program.
Details
The program defined by S2727 specifically applies to proceedings involving electric distribution companies serving more than one hundred thousand customers, electric transmission companies, gas distribution companies, and energy efficiency programs. This targeted approach aims to ensure that resources are allocated to areas where they can significantly enhance public participation and oversight.
Summary
Bill S2727, known as the 'Equitable Participation in Utility Regulation Act', establishes a compensation program aimed at assisting intervenors in public utilities commission proceedings. This legislation aims to provide grants for legal fees, expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs incurred by intervenors. Such funding is designed to ensure that individuals or organizations facing significant financial hardship can effectively participate in proceedings that influence utility regulations, making the process more equitable and accessible for all stakeholders involved.
Contention
Some notable points of contention regarding S2727 involve the administrative provisions surrounding the grant approval process. Questions may arise over the sufficiency of the appropriations necessary to maintain the fund, as well as potential debates regarding the limits of funding application criteria. Moreover, the prohibition on the use of grant funds for judicial appeals could limit the recourse available to intervenors after proceedings conclude, a limitation that might be challenged by advocacy groups concerned with maintaining fair representation in the regulatory process. Additionally, there could be discussions surrounding whether the mechanisms for funding should include contributions from larger utility companies.
Establishes an intervenor support program to provide compensation for an intervenor who makes a substantial contribution to a proceeding resulting in a decision favorable to the interest of utility consumers.
Establishes an intervenor support program to provide compensation for an intervenor who makes a substantial contribution to a proceeding resulting in a decision favorable to the interest of utility consumers.
Provides amendments to procedures necessary for approval of transactions between utilities by giving the public utilities commission jurisdiction; mandates public hearings, allows intervention by any interested party and provides for appeal.
Provides amendments to procedures necessary for approval of transactions between utilities by giving the public utilities commission jurisdiction; mandates public hearings, allows intervention by any interested party and provides for appeal.
Increases the public utilities reserve fund cap and the cap on expenses relating to the public utilities commission and the division of public utilities and carriers representing the state before federal agencies.
Increases the public utilities reserve fund cap and the cap on expenses relating to the public utilities commission and the division of public utilities and carriers representing the state before federal agencies.
Increases the membership of the energy facility siting board from 3 to 5 members and would revise the process of energy facility siting to mandate inclusion/participation of the host community of the facility as well as of the public and cities and towns.
Requires that insurance policies for property damage, personal injuries, and indemnification other than payment of compensation for workers compensation, state policy limits and no amount of the policy may be used to pay costs to defend a claim.
Establishes thermal energy networks network infrastructure by any public utility company that provides electric/natural gas distribution to maximize cost-effective investments deemed in the public interest by the public utilities commission (PUC).
Prohibits public utilities, serving greater 100,000 customers from recovering through rates any direct or indirect cost associated with, amongst other costs, advertising, marketing, communications.
Establishes an intervenor support program to provide compensation for an intervenor who makes a substantial contribution to a proceeding resulting in a decision favorable to the interest of utility consumers.
Establishes an intervenor support program to provide compensation for an intervenor who makes a substantial contribution to a proceeding resulting in a decision favorable to the interest of utility consumers.
Creates an intervenor compensation program to provide compensation in the form of grants for legal fees, expert witness fees, and other reasonable costs to an intervenor in both, energy siting board and public utilities commission proceedings.