Rhode Island House Bill H8036

Rhode Island 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/26
• Refer: 2/27/26

Caption

ROOM) ACT (Expands access to inherently affordable housing by re-legalizing co-living/single-room occupancy (SRO) and shared dwelling models of many types.

Impact

The bill stipulates that municipalities must allow co-living properties as a permitted use across various residential and commercial zones. It preempts local ordinances that impose stricter regulations than those outlined in the bill, thus streamlining the process for establishing co-living arrangements. Notably, it prevents municipalities from restricting occupancy based on income, familial status, or other discriminatory factors, thereby enhancing tenant rights and access to housing opportunities. This change could significantly increase the availability of lower-cost housing options in desirable urban areas, supporting those with lower income levels.

Summary

House Bill H8036, titled the Restoring Options in Occupancy Models (ROOM) Act, aims to address the housing availability and affordability crisis in Rhode Island. The bill seeks to restore co-living arrangements and single-room occupancy (SRO) setups, which have been historically limited by restrictive zoning laws and building regulations. By allowing municipalities to permit these housing models, the bill intends to expand affordable living options for residents, especially those looking to mitigate housing costs or seeking communal living environments that foster social connections.

Contention

Despite its objectives, H8036 has sparked debate regarding local control over housing regulations. Supporters argue that it provides much-needed options for affordable housing and addresses the crisis effectively through modern solutions like co-living arrangements. Critics, however, express concerns about potential impacts on neighborhood dynamics, suggesting that such a rapid increase in co-living arrangements could lead to challenges in maintaining community standards and managing communal living situations. Proponents of local governance assert that cities and towns should retain the authority to set specific regulations tailored to their unique socio-economic landscapes.