Rhode Island House Bill H7307

Rhode Island 2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/26
• Refer: 1/23/26

Caption

Establishes the Rhode Island Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny Act which would require review and approval of rules with implementation and compliance costs of one million dollars ($1,000,000) or more over a two-year period.

Impact

The implementation of H7307 would significantly alter the process through which executive agencies can enact regulations. By requiring legislative approval for major regulations, the bill places a greater check on executive power and seeks to align regulatory practices with public interests. The intention is to prevent regulatory overreach and ensure that any new regulations are economically sound and justified, thus potentially curbing excessive or harmful regulations that could strain businesses and the economy.

Summary

House Bill H7307, titled the Rhode Island Regulations from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny Act, aims to enhance the legislative oversight of executive branch regulations that entail significant economic impacts. Specifically, the bill stipulates that any regulatory measure estimated to incur implementation or compliance costs of $1,000,000 or more over a two-year period must receive specific legislative approval before it can take effect. This provision is designed to ensure that substantial regulations receive thorough review and reflect the interests of Rhode Island citizens, promoting accountability and transparency within state governance.

Contention

Introducing H7307 has sparked discussions regarding the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches. Proponents argue that this bill is crucial for safeguarding democratic principles and ensuring that those who are governed have a voice in regulatory processes that might affect their lives significantly. However, some critics express concerns that this comprehensive oversight might slow down the implementation of necessary regulations, particularly those needed for public health and safety. Additionally, exceptions have been carved out for emergency regulations and those mandated by federal law, raising questions about the scope and effectiveness of the bill's provisions.