Rhode Island 2025 Regular Session

Rhode Island Senate Bill S0976

Introduced
4/16/25  
Refer
4/16/25  
Report Pass
6/12/25  
Engrossed
6/17/25  
Engrossed
6/20/25  

Caption

Mandates cosmetic medical procedures be performed by a physician, PA, APRN, or delegated to a qualified non-physician, non-PA or non-APRN under the supervision of a physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse.

Impact

This legislation has significant implications for the state’s laws regarding healthcare practice in medical spas. It recognizes the growing popularity of cosmetic procedures and aims to raise safety standards within this sector. By requiring procedures to be performed under medical supervision, the bill seeks to mitigate risks associated with cosmetic treatments and enhance patient protection. This shift also clarifies the roles and responsibilities of non-physician personnel in medical spas, establishing criteria for their involvement in procedures that may require specialized training.

Summary

Senate Bill S0976, known as the Medical Spas Safety Act, aims to establish comprehensive regulations governing the practice of cosmetic medical procedures in medical spas across Rhode Island. The bill mandates that all cosmetic procedures, which include treatments aimed at improving a person's appearance that do not require sedation, must be performed by licensed and qualified health professionals. Specifically, these procedures are to be supervised by physicians, physician assistants (PAs), or advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) who assume the responsibility for patient care and procedural delegation.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be largely supportive, particularly from healthcare professionals and patient advocacy groups who emphasize the importance of safety in cosmetic procedures. There is a consensus on the necessity for formal regulations to ensure that procedures are conducted by adequately trained personnel. However, some concerns have been expressed regarding the potential financial impact on smaller medical spas, which may struggle to meet the new compliance and supervision requirements imposed by the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention have surfaced concerning the specific training requirements stipulated for both supervising and non-supervising professionals performing cosmetic procedures. Opponents of the bill argue that the stringent regulations could create barriers to entry for qualified practitioners, particularly those operating independently. Additionally, the delineation of responsibilities between supervisory roles and those performing the procedures may lead to confusion and varied interpretations of the law, necessitating further guidance from the state health department.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3749

Relating to the regulation of the provision of elective intravenous therapy.

RI H5351

Mandates cosmetic medical procedures be performed by a physician, PA, APRN, or delegated to a qualified non-physician, non-PA or non-APRN under the supervision of a physician, physician assistant, or advanced practice registered nurse.

NV SB294

Revises provisions relating to physician assistants. (BDR 54-965)

AZ HB2025

Scope of practice; medical assistants

OH HB377

Regards use of light-based medical devices for hair removal

OH SB226

Regards use of light-based medical devices for hair removal

KY SB116

AN ACT relating to physician assistants.

CA AB460

Radiologic technologists: venipuncture: direct supervision.