Pennsylvania Senate Bill SR33

Pennsylvania 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/25
• Refer: 3/10/25

Caption

Directing the Joint State Government Commission to conduct a study on the public water and wastewater system acquisitions since Act 12 of 2016 was enacted, including the rate increases for the water and wastewater systems before and after the acquisitions, and issue a report of its findings and recommendations to the Senate.

Impact

The resolution highlights a significant transition in Pennsylvania's approach to public utilities, particularly after the introduction of Act 12 in 2016, which allowed for the privatization of water systems. By investigating these acquisitions, the resolution seeks to provide insights into how privatization impacts costs and service quality for consumers. Furthermore, the study will analyze public feedback and the economic repercussions of these acquisitions on local communities, potentially leading to legislative recommendations for future practices in managing public water and wastewater systems.

Summary

Senate Resolution 33 looks to direct the Joint State Government Commission to conduct a comprehensive study on public water and wastewater system acquisitions that have taken place since the enactment of Act 12 of 2016. This research will particularly focus on analyzing any rate increases associated with these systems both before and after their acquisition. The intention behind this resolution is to assess the effects of privatization in this sector and evaluate whether such changes have benefitted or harmed ratepayers financially. The study aims to ensure that any acquisition of public systems is met with transparency and fairness towards the ratepayers who depend on them for essential services.

Sentiment

Sentiment around SR33 appears to be focused on consumer protection and oversight. Many advocates support a thorough examination of how private ownership has affected water rates and accessibility in Pennsylvania. However, there is an underlying concern regarding the potential bias against privatization, especially given findings that suggest higher costs associated with privately owned systems. The resolution thus requires careful scrutiny to balance the benefits of privatization—such as efficiency and investment—with the rights and needs of the ratepayers. It embodies a proactive step towards ensuring that local communities are protected from potential exploitation by private entities.

Contention

One major point of contention that may arise from this bill is the debate over private vs. public ownership of water systems. Critics have expressed that privatization tends to lead to higher water rates, which might disproportionately impact vulnerable populations who can least afford these costs. Additionally, there are concerns about the accountability and responsibility of private companies in providing consistent and fair services. With the resolution's focus on transparency, achieving a consensus that addresses fears while ensuring homeowners are not overburdened will be a challenge for lawmakers moving forward.